JC-CT
-
Posts
18,191 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Forums
American Weather
Media Demo
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by JC-CT
-
Yeah, and also I should preface it by saying for SNE. I'm sure Jeff has his eye on Tuesday morning.
-
With accumulations, yeah
-
One eye on late next week
-
Anything Tuesday has to be that crap where flakes are falling but accumulations don't actually budge an inch
-
Well it's also 72-96 hours out so that certainly makes sense that confidence is lower
-
I tried to, but I was following the snow maps and they had it misplaced so I ended up throwing them right into Kevin's fanny.
-
That has actually been stubbornly persistent
-
I'd be very surprised if somewhere in the berks/e nys didn't.
-
It had the surface above 0 with 850s below 0 all sunday night into monday in W CT. It seemed odd.
-
It is?
-
Exactly what it is indicating, just a function of how tucked it is. W Mass special
-
No significant change for the waa that I can see
-
No..all models show it
-
Looks like junk.
-
The ggem is coming in frigid in the mids
-
Or, sleet bomb followed by intermittent nonaccumating snow showers. Or something in between. TBD
-
It's just getting into SNE at 84.
-
I'd take the look at 84
-
Not really. Just shows the possibility if the thermals end up on the warmer side of guidance for the waa. Evolution is similar to other guidance.
-
NAM is still a sleetfest s of the pike and def S of the CT MA border
-
20' or bust
-
I dunno. I'd say outside se mass and immediate coast, regionwide 6"+ is likely. I can still see a lot going wrong with temps on the front end and banding on the back end
-
I was looking specifically in CT where the thermals on the front end are the difference between 3" and 8" - but the 6z GFS already came in colder which they didn't have. I'd like to see it come in colder each run lol
-
Yeah they cut off at 7am Monday. But definitely hedging against GFS thermals
-
BOX seemed to think so this morning as well based on their map through Monday morning
