And I agree, the watered down article from Barrons is "garbage". But that's not what you wrote, nor what I took exception to. To quote you "Was it extremely consistent or did it waver back-and-forth and have a million different solutions? If that is the case then GARBAGE. That's no different than what models currently do." You're calling the AI "GARBAGE" in this sentence, but as noted in your subsequent post this particular implementation of AI is actually better at some things due to it's hybrid approach.
Again, you're a smart guy just suggesting to temper your immediate knee-jerk distaste of AI reactions and read before you post. Genuinely best regards.