Jump to content

Heisy

Members
  • Posts

    9,030
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Heisy

  1. Surprised no one posted the control, it’s 10:1 but is basically the extended euro. This was a sick run for your region .
  2. This run was likely going to clobber just Nw of Philly beyond 90 with ccb precip. Surprised down here, blip or real deal? Def a south push this run .
  3. I’m in Philly and i have major doubts we see anything either. GFS is horrid at snow forecasting. I’m also selling the cmc it’s been all over the place run to run. Seems to be playing catch-up. I gotta place in poconos I could potentially drive to if 15”+ is forecasted when we get close .
  4. Better visible here. Look at the angle of the confluence. All because that darn piece diving in faster. Really annoyingly that close .
  5. That lobe is killing us. The runs from 00z and before kept it separate. Finally 6z caved and phases it a bit and it’s swinging the main low farther N .
  6. Bet this comes farther N because GFS finally caved to other data and shows more interaction with the tpv lobe. Almost acts like a seesaw to swing it N .
  7. End of 6z control changed the pac pattern up a bit vs 00z euro run. Wonder if 12z can muster up anything with the STJ during 12z run .
  8. Ha you beat me to it. Made my post before I saw yours. Now THIS is a map I want to see hang around. There’s actually room for amplification .
  9. I’ve said since Jan I loved the sound of the 2/24/24 blizzard… well…. THIS to me looks more conducive for a classic storm than anything I see before imo, but we’ll see It is wayyyy out there obviously .
  10. Either gonna be a huge score for the GFS or an epic fail .
  11. Cmc at least sped up the N/S. I want the Ukie to show something similar and then I’ll get a little excited before the euro .
  12. 6z control is not good, sped up the main wave and it drives the SLP over Pa, so the op was going to be bad. If 12z doesn’t correct I’d likely move my focus to 16-18th. This event was always a long shot to begin with since it was the first wave of the pattern change and we have marginal cold air .
  13. Icon hangs energy back like euro but then actually brings it pretty far N, I’ll take that progression though. .
  14. Yes because it’s separating the N/S and main shortwave. Until one camp caves it’s hard to take any run serious. GFS is usually the one that does the caving so I’d lean euro evolution personally. .
  15. Didn’t realize there was a new thread. Here is 18z control. Still way different evolution than GFS. No initial phase and NS heads E. I think this looks decent .
  16. The control has always been the OP run at slightly lower resolution. Next year we won’t have an OP we will be relying on the EPS and control As for the GFS and temps. Who cares? It has a completely different evolution than the euro so until that’s settled it doesn’t matter. This looks like it may have ended up phasing with the second NS piece as well. See what happens at 00z .
  17. 18z control improved on 12z. Less compressed flow. Has the same evolution (different than GFS camp) This looks like it was gonna work… .
  18. We’re probably another 24 hours or so of figuring out which progression wins out. Not sure which I prefer honestly. Perfect world to me is a euro progression and a phase with 2nd N/S piece vs GFS where yea you’ll have a stronger storm but there’s no lead wave to reinforce colder temps .
  19. Yep, it’s the one we want, just gotta keep amping it up. A phase you were going to have issue with temps imo. We could still hypothetically back side phase as long as that N/S piece pushes ahead .
  20. Yea but if the northern shortwave and the main one don’t have enough separation you’d end up with like a 00z cmc solution. Yea that trend is favorable, but only if the southern main shortwave backs up/slows down a bit there. .
×
×
  • Create New...