Jump to content

cbmclean

Members
  • Posts

    3,163
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by cbmclean

  1. Man I hate seeing rain in Quebec in mid/late December.
  2. Actually what I think I have learned is that THE critical factor is always whichever one sucks for us at a given time.
  3. Yeah but based on PSU's findings it appears that the NAO may be more important in the average west-based Nino because it helps modulate the alwaye Nino tendency to inject Pacific air into NA. I agree that in Nina the PAC is an absolute. If it is flooding us with Pac Puke then forget the NAO. If we have a nice EPO or PNA ridge, then perhaps the NAO is of less consequence.
  4. The @psuhoffman lending library has many volumes you could check out on this topic, but in your heart of hearts, you know the answer to this question already
  5. I thought El Nino vs La Nina was modulated by the PDO as opposed to the AMO.
  6. Be sure to include lots of flame emojis.
  7. Tell your boss that the NAO has degraded on the long range guidance and as a result you need to take a few extra weeks off to watch the models.
  8. He still lives and no one can tell me any different!! In other news, a link for the curious to the CPS MJO weekly write-up https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/MJO/mjoupdate.pdf Summary: there is a disagreement between the dynamical models which predict the wave dies (potentially due to destructive interference from a CCKW in the Indian Ocean), and the "RMM forecast" which favor continuation of the wave into 7 and beyond. Not sure what entity/model is the "RMM forecast" other than the models, but I sure hope they are right. I've heard many people that the models tend to kill waves too quickly so maybe...
  9. Honest question, does it "count" if it tunnels through the COD to get to phase 8? Not used to seeing that.
  10. If the opinion of a random SE weenie (who has latched on to this forum like a tick), makes any difference to you, I appreciate your unbiased and intellectually impartial analysis. Please keep it coming.
  11. I just ignored my first ever person on here. I feel dirty.
  12. I think I may have read something about how stout +EAMT events can help destabilize the PV. Anyone else ever hear of that?
  13. The problem is that individual isn't doing it just out of lack of knowledge. He is a known troll who has haunted the tropical forum for several years now.
  14. Is it just me or do perfect track storms become more common lately when the CONUS is flooded with Pac Puke? I know I know; the MA used to be able overcome less than ideal Pacifics, but not any more.
  15. A link to Dr. Simon Lee's page documenting his weather "regimes". https://simonleewx.com/north-american-weather-regimes/ Obviously we are about to embark on a very robust "Pacific Trough" regime. There is some hint of a potential transition to a "Greenland High" regime starting between Christmas and New Years, but it is by no means a certainty.
  16. Must be nice. The I-95 corridor has been absolutely shafted. Virtually nothing here.
  17. That spin move Wallace pulled out was impressive. He definitely hit the circle button on his controller.
  18. @CAPE @WxUSAF @psuhoffman Do you guys share in today's general despair? Looking at the big three ensembles, not sure that I see anything worse so much as just a failure to see anything better. Perhaps I am just impatient.
  19. The mood has turned ugly today.
  20. Not necessarily. It takes mental discipline and an analytical mind. Neither is in over abundance.
  21. Couple a' things: 1. Everyone on here has been burned by can-kickage, especially over the last 7 years, Many of us vividly remember the 2019 El Nada vividly. So at the first hint of CK, we get the sweats. It's like the smell of smoke to a herd of spooked horses. 2. You have a history of accuracy in predictions. Lately many(most?) of the predictions have been of doom, simply because we have been a prolonged stretch of total suck. When you note even a potential for concern, the wise among us take note. Case in point: the famous December 30th 2020 post where you described that, based on ALL historical evidence: we were in for fail. And fail we did. So, take it as a compliment.
  22. I haven't seen any of the 500 HP verification scores lately. There was a time not too long ago when the GFS had dropped to third behind the CMC. Is that no longer true?
  23. @psuhoffman mentioned that as "Phase 2" of the master plan. Meanwhile GEPS has some hints of ridging in the EPO PNA domain but very subtle. I hate waiting on pattern changes. ETA: Correction, I should have said PNA domain, not EPO. Alaska still troughy.
×
×
  • Create New...