Jump to content

Amped

Members
  • Posts

    13,880
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Amped

  1. Someone else was coming back from VT in that. We were on a HS ski trip, think t was Okemo. We ended up having to return to CT a day early. Hit snow S of Hartford.
  2. My favorite non Canadian fantasy storm of the year. Historic snow and ice storm across a huge area. Slower moving than 2003 or 1996.
  3. TooK the gfs over 36hrs to get the snow from Arkansas to DC. But after that it's an awesome storm day 11-12.
  4. I'm pretty much calling for 2-4" with marginal surface temps like most other mets here? But apparently that makes me a know it all giving everyone the finger.
  5. 2-4" with temps in the mid 30s gets a WSW? LOL
  6. Every model has been badly under doing the SE ridge in the D7+ timeframe. I would take that with lass than a grain of salt.
  7. 2-4" for everyone sounds good.. Going to be hard to get a snow depth of more than 4" on a paved surface, unless you're elevated, and well NW of 95 or there's extreme banding and a lot more precip than shown.
  8. Going to be something huge for the middle of the country., we might be too far SE.
  9. The NAM is really pissed that the rgem dethroned it for worst model last storm, it wants revenge.
  10. Well somehow it formed a coastal. in the middle of a ridge with increasing heights. Not sure how it pulled that off.
  11. It is good for the I81 crew. I 95 is getting mostly liquid out of that setup.
  12. Not liking this trend, models consistently underdoing the SE ridge in Day 5-10 timeframe. Best we can hope for is a thump, then a lot of rain.
  13. It does look a lot less amped than the GFS at 24hrs.
  14. Pretty big ice storm for western areas day 7. GFS CMC and Icon all have similar solutions.
  15. These systems don't phase, but if the NS gets ahead , it will crush the SS before it gets up the coast. So you should probably hope the SS doesn't slow down here, and the NS doesn't speed up. Either will lead to a weaker further south system.
  16. Just cause we moved the RGEM to the naughty list doesn't mean we should put the Sref back on the nice list.
  17. Try this https://github.com/msw17002/Historical-Precipitation-Analysis/tree/main/Northeast_Snowfall
  18. GFS is amped up with the NS but not as far west as the NAM.
  19. It was really more a comment into the mechanics of the storm. We need the NS more amped up if it's going to come up the coast. I really never trusted the NAM or RGEM on their own. Always worth waiting for the better models to come out.
  20. RGEM doesn't like the idea. Not digging the NS the way the NAM did.
  21. December 2009 was the last time DC BAL PHL NYC and BOS all got 10+ from the same storm. The NAM is close. 6z Para had the storm too
×
×
  • Create New...