Jump to content

BullCityWx

Members
  • Posts

    8,892
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BullCityWx

  1. Even 2-3" down to Austin. All of the elevated roadways there will love that.
  2. If I had to venture a guess about the 15z SREF, I think means are going to go up. The most snow on the entire map is in Richmond.
  3. Oh yeah, yall will not only be below zero, you'll probably be five or ten below.
  4. Extracted data shows a thickness of 496 at RIC on 1/22. Wow.
  5. The GFS is stupid cold in the long range. 498 thickness line is south of Richmond.
  6. I wanted to dig in deeper IMBY for the 12z NAM. Looks like we're all snow until hour 63 when some IP mixes in. F5wx.com is giving me a roughly 6:1 ratio with 1.45 QPF. That's still 9" with a 6:1 ratio. Not sure that I buy that solution but it's fun to ponder.
  7. I aint gonna believe it until the NGM and RUC buys in. The NGM was how I knew the February 2004 storm was legit. It had an 8 in the snow column in MOS and it NEVER had an 8.
  8. Also thinking about this system: if we’re thinking this system is dynamic and have banding, the NAM is clearly designed to pick that up better than the GFS.
  9. The GFS still had me getting a half of an inch on Christmas Eve at this range. Y’all remember that?
  10. You nailed it. When we see lighter precip, we see less frozen. When we see heavier QPF depicted, the column is colder.
  11. I’ll be honest: I like the timing on the NAM. If it’s right, there’s zero diurnal heating. It’s snowing by 7AM and only picks up in intensity.
  12. WRAL believes that accumulations are most likely N&W of 85.
  13. I think we're smarter to use the ensemble means for now. It smooths out the potential convective and banding elements some of these models are seeing.
  14. One thing I’ve noted in a few runs is there’s almost like a Miller B transfer with the QPF. Feel like we’re going to see people very happy where you actually see precip.
  15. GFS para finds a way to miss Charlotte so it’s obviously legit.
  16. Actually that GFS run has warning criteria snows for the entire 85 corridor from Gastonia to the Virginia line.
  17. That GFS run has warning criteria snow for good chunks of Durham, Orange and Chatham counties along with Wake north of 540.
  18. Yep. You don’t see the sleet returns though on the 3k like the 12k.
  19. It’s a joke, like throwing a damn dart.
  20. 3k NAM is much colder and has snow much further south.
  21. That’s why I came in here to make that statement
×
×
  • Create New...