-
Posts
11,418 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Forums
American Weather
Media Demo
Store
Gallery
Posts posted by paweather
-
-
3 minutes ago, Atomixwx said:
Sir, let's keep race out of this lol
Sent from my motorola edge 5G UW (2021) using Tapatalk
HAHA!!! OK Thanks.
-
2 minutes ago, Itstrainingtime said:
Despite the area's first real winter threat of the season, CTP is already sounding the horn for next week: (and a warning to @canderson to go on high alert:)
.LONG TERM /SUNDAY THROUGH TUESDAY/... 03/00Z update...winter storm system for next Tue/Wed is fcst to be much stronger and track farther to the west - which puts mixed precip (snow-ice to rain transition) squarely in play. The other key impact with this storm will be strong winds with MSLP anomalies (sub 990mb) reaching 3-4SD below the mean.
I'll take a good front end dump and see it wash.
-
11 minutes ago, Bubbler86 said:
Yea, I think it's a concern as modeled. Let's assume the Canadian's are right and much of PA gets 10-15" of snow....the next two days the temps are near or below normal all day then more snow comes followed by 2-3" of rain. Could have some roof issues as well as streets not being able to move water away fast enough.
I'm just glad we will be white this weekend. Whatever happens next week let it happen. Except for house damage.
But at least white for a few days.
-
1
-
-
6-7" on the GFS.
-
9 minutes ago, Atomixwx said:
So we take der iKon seriously now? Lol
Sent from my motorola edge 5G UW (2021) using Tapatalk
Nope. Just model observation.
-
ICON Big hit!
-
7 minutes ago, Bubbler86 said:
True except it is above freezing in the SE corner of the LSV at the surface. Would it actually be above freezing with heavy snow falling? I vote no but that is what the output shows.
SE corner Lanco or Phily burbs?
-
13 minutes ago, mitchnick said:
Rgem has value. Nam has issues. But I plead guilty to posting the Nam when it looks good. It's what a weenie does.
Thank you. Weenie heaven for sure. Rgem? LOL
-
5 minutes ago, anthonyweather said:
Wtf is with the NAM
.NAM at 70 plus is never to take.
-
2 minutes ago, Bubbler86 said:
But the 6Z Euro is warm. At hour 90, some of the LSV is mixed. Nothing like the GFS which is my point of the gyrations with the models.
Understood for the heart of the LSV we are good. But yes some mixing SE for sure.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Bubbler86 said:
It is uncanny how up and down the tracking has been on this one. It seems every 12 hours we have one suite threatening a little snow/a sunny day on Saturday and another driving a low too far north. Goes to show how hard trying to put a forecast out is...the interactions are too complicated to pin down.
Blizz shared the EURO it only goes out to 90 after that it dumps.
-
-
-
11 minutes ago, mitchnick said:
Icon complete on tt. Big hit
Hit’’em!
-
18 minutes ago, MAG5035 said:
Could be a couple of things. I won’t put words in anyone’s mouth but here’s my objective thoughts on some of the cons of this setup.
Precip issues are still possible in the southern tier even with these lower QPF/progressive solutions depending on the thermals.. something we won’t have a firm handle of till we’re in range of the high res guidance. I do think we’ll see mostly snow in here from this, but the possibility of some mixing in the southern tier still exists. We’ve changed the pattern around to where it’s cold enough and we have a high available for this system, but it’s still not significantly cold here.. just cold that’s average.
The 500mb pattern out west is not typically what you would see for a C-PA snowstorm. We’re always looking for the big western ridge and associated amplification to run a coastal storm all the way up the coast and we have the complete opposite with the -PNA setting up and a big western trough. What makes this work is having some downstream blocking and 50/50 low allowing this shortwave that kicks out from the southwest go underneath us. What’s being pointed out by some is these weaker solutions late today along with being faster come from more energy dumping into the southwestern trough (which eventually becomes our next headache next week) making for a weaker shortwave (that becomes our weekend storm) that kicks out. That kind of evolution takes away the top end potential. This is still probably a half decent event but not a blockbuster 1-2 foot type thing. More of 4-8” kind of event is what I’m thinking right now for the swath of heaviest snow… which I think about anyone in here would be happy with.
Makes sense thanks Mag
-
18 minutes ago, Itstrainingtime said:
So you're saying that Elliott, who is a great met, is totally wrong when he said that the models do NOT fit the pattern?
What is meant by fits the pattern?
-
1 minute ago, Blizzard of 93 said:
Yep forget model worries
-
2 minutes ago, Bubbler86 said:
The 18gfs was great news for the Southern pa counties. So we're most of the GEFS members.
Does that include Lebanon county? LOL
-
6 minutes ago, Itstrainingtime said:
MU finally said something about the weekend: "snow lovers should keep expectations in check"
Also indicated that the pattern does NOT match the model outputs.
Detailed analysis tomorrow.
Expectations being plowable check.
-
1
-
-
Yes @Bubbler86it is going to burn me I’m sure but I gotta try everything to get a plowable snow!
-
@Blizzard of 93needs some help with this model worries stuff! We been there done that over the years all the time
-
1
-
-
25 minutes ago, Itstrainingtime said:
12z and 18z GFS couldn't be much more different. Maybe some people "get" the same amount of snow, but the storm's evolution is vastly different. And different in a positive way for us SE folks.
Yep still same here
-
9 minutes ago, Bubbler86 said:
All in all the kuch range for my area has not changed that much.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Superstorm said:
Good run
.Yep fairly consistent!
Central PA Winter 23/24
in Upstate New York/Pennsylvania
Posted
Welcome from Lebanon!