Jump to content

SnowGoose69

Professional Forecaster
  • Posts

    16,218
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SnowGoose69

  1. Trust me. They ain’t getting much either. BL issues down there. The NAM has been the only run that’s shown anything crazy and the snow maps are overdone
  2. This is one of those cases where S and W of NYC can do better. It’s not a true transfer but basically the vort gives way to a coastal low so there’s noticeably as you can tell a dead period from like TTN up to middle of CT before the coastal ramps up. A big reason the best looks are coming from the globals such as the UKMET/GFS is probably because they’re overdoing the QPF look in that corridor where as the mesos know there won’t be much there
  3. I think the UKMET has a tendency to bias too far west at times with weaker coastal systems. It’s the real dynamic bombs it has progressive issues with oddly enough
  4. Seeing the globals be west of the mesos overall is usually a suspicious thing. Often means globals are wrong from my experience and often happens with fast moving systems like this
  5. 03Z SREFs wetter again for Tues night. Euro did not make much of a move NW though it did come back from its 18Z run
  6. UKMET also came west for Tues night. Still a miss though except far eastern LI
  7. Its taking quite some time to reach the ground but someone might get a quick inch
  8. If it ends up being a continuing trend this could be a decent event but we would continued ticks here for the next 36 hours.
  9. The NAM got owned with this event. Euro seems to have had best handle on that 05-09Z window for a couple of days.
  10. Not that it means much but the NAM got schooled tonight down here. We probably see a 3-4 hour period of light snow 06-09z and the NAM til this run wanted no part of it.
  11. I expected the NW tick back but I'm still not sold we see anything much further with it.
  12. It’s gonna come back NW I think but probably not enough outside of far eastern areas of Long Island and Mass
  13. Flow is way too fast. Better chance this corrects back east I think
  14. If you back 5-7 days ago and check the ECMWF MJO forecasts you can see why they are so unpredictable. The only thing it still appears to have the same is that it goes to 4-5 but how it gets there has become delayed and it goes through 3 now first. It just tells you anything beyond Day 7 on those forecasts is iffy.
  15. Ultimately it’ll probably come down to the MJO from 1/20 or 1/25 onward. If it goes back through 4-5-6 this winter is done. If it stays quiet it could possibly be a big 6-8 week period
  16. The pattern is pretty active which may prevent there being absurd warm anomalies this month, even for places in the SE US because as long as we keep getting systems ejecting out of that trof we are going to continue having FROPAs in the East. Even if they’re inducing modified Pac air it doesn’t seem at any point we see a sustained SER with bright sunshine for days on end
  17. I’m beginning to wonder if we need a major La Niña or El Niño event to shuffle the pacific SSTS so that we don’t have this same issue with the MJO winter after winter for the foreseeable future
  18. It develops the system way too late. The 500 track though isn’t bad
  19. It basically is the same idea as the Euro. It just develops everything 18-30 hours later
  20. TBH based off thickness alone I have no idea how all that precip after 81 isn’t snow everywhere. I wouldn’t get into temps this far out but in that sort of setup with a low that deep everyone west of it is snowing
  21. Right as I was wondering to myself if Gary Bettman is okay. He really looked bad today
  22. The HRRR just seems awful beyond 8 hours. Extending it to 60 seems nuts
×
×
  • Create New...