Jump to content

SnowGoose69

Professional Forecaster
  • Posts

    16,283
  • Joined

  • Last visited

4 Followers

About SnowGoose69

Profile Information

  • Four Letter Airport Code For Weather Obs (Such as KDCA)
    KFRG
  • Gender
    Male
  • Location:
    New York, NY

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Seems the EPS/GEFS today may have killed it more too. I'm not sure if that is why today we've seen a trend towards less ridging in the E after D10 somewhat. A less potent run through 6 late and 7 might result in that.
  2. 925 winds for the metro are 44-49kts from 03-11z or so, sustained on MOS is around 30...if this was day time I'd be worried about mixing to 900 or 875 with gusts of 50kts but I think we might be only 42-44
  3. Thankfully due to La Nina strength we can probably toss both 88 and 99. I think both those years also had W QBOs and W or CNTRL based La Ninas
  4. Good thing peak winds at 900-925 occur when its dark, if this came through 12-18 hours later I think some gusts over 50 would be possible.
  5. The ACCESS BOM from Australia when I checked yesterday argued it does not really make it heavily into 7 and definitely not 8. I have found that model sometimes is better than the EPS/GEFS for the MJO in the longer range
  6. Yeah problem still is the subsurface is concerning. I am not confident this thing gets over like -0.6
  7. As I said last winter and what mostly transpired, the MJO can be in bad phases as long as its weak or just mostly nonexistent which was the case last winter most of the time. You just don't want it strongly in 3-4-5 all winter
  8. Jan/Feb 90 was the highest AO/NAO ever I think other than Jan/Feb 1989. I still think its the record now though 2018 or 2020 may have surpassed it. In general there's been tendencies near the solar max if you have a persistently -AO/NAO in Nov/Dec it can be a problematic issue in Jan/Feb where it swings wildly to be strongly positive. We saw this a bit in 2000-01 too, the AO remained negative in Jan/Feb but the NAO went significantly positive the remainder of the winter.
  9. There was just a ton of bad luck. It wasn’t so much the winter patterns were bad outside of 82-83 84-85 and 88-89. Even 89-90 December was decent it was just that everything got suppressed
  10. I guess the snow total was skewed by the 4/1 event. Overall it was a strange winter because indice wise it was good in December and January. There was just no snow or it was all inland
  11. The 90s were odd depending where you were. 92-93 and 96-97 sucked in NYC and the metro but basically everywhere else in the northeast they were good winters. 93-94 95-96 were the only two that were really universally good winters for snow most areas. At least most agree that 90-91 91-92 94-95 97-98 sucked everywhere though
  12. Its December depiction makes sense to me, not sure about Jan/Feb. The Feb anomaly does not look much like any recent Nina or neutral composite we've seen. It looks more like a raging progressive Pac jet type pattern. If that type of setup verified I think the SER would be much stronger in the east
  13. 2011-2012 and 2001-2002 to me are always automatic tosses, those were just wild anomalies in neutral winters that just can never be used as analogs. Its similar to how 95-96, at least as far as precip anomalies should never be considered heavily, temp wise that winter was not especially cold in the east despite many thinking it was.
  14. Yeah I think 2018 was the year where in southeast parts of the US all the trees opened and there was major damage from frosts in March and April
  15. Last winter the GEFS tended for the most part to be too strong though. It had done much better across 22-23 23-24 but was definitely overdone last winter.
×
×
  • Create New...