donsutherland1

That's hugely impressive. Worcester has a real shot at setting a new record.

Select Monthly Snowfall Totals for New England: Boston: 21.8” (7th snowiest March) Concord: 28.1” (11th snowiest March) Portland: 28.8” (11th snowiest March) Worcester: 40.0” (2nd snowiest March) March Monthly Snowfall Records for those Cities: Boston: 38.9”, 1993 Concord: 38.3”, 1956 Portland: 49.0”, 1993 Worcester: 44.1”, 1993

The monthly total is now 21.8" making March 2018 the 7th snowiest March on record.

An individual who, along with Eric Fisher, who were "asleep at the switch" during the storm, didn't see the prolonged/intense banding on radar that extended across Wilmington (or didn't properly understand how to read the radar) and decided to take it upon themselves to tweet to the general public questioning Ray's (40/70 Benchmark) snowfall total. https://twitter.com/ncoramwx/status/973752308914892800 Neither of them was in Wilmington at any time during the storm. Neither of them undertook any degree of due diligence to verify the snowfall amount. They didn't even make a minimal effort. They simply and rashly threw it out without even bothering to understand the measurement (i.e., examine the radar loops during the day, consider mesoscale effects, etc.) and went public about it. Ray deserved far better. For all my time here at AmericanWx (and EasternWx before it), Ray has been dedicated and meticulous. He doesn't cut corners or inflate snowfall amounts. Ray is a real asset to this Board and to the New England weather community. I very much hope he won't get discouraged by what happened yesterday.

14.8"

Very impressive.

With yesterday's 14.5"snow, March 2018 is now the 7th snowiest March on record in Boston. The most March snowfall is as follows: 1. 38.9", 1993 2. 33.0", 1916 3. 31.2", 1956 4. 22.9", 1967 5. 22.3", 1960 6. 21.9", 1906 7. 21.5", 2018

It's sad.

Ray is reliable. Anyone here knows it. I am not sure why Coram and Fisher are making an issue of it. Perhaps, had they been watching the radar, they would have a better understanding of how the storm played out.

Congratulations. It was an awesome storm up your way.

000 NOUS41 KBOX 131822 PNSBOX CTZ002>004-MAZ002>024-026-RIZ001>008-141600- Public Information Statement National Weather Service Taunton MA 220 PM EDT Tue Mar 13 2018 ...PRELIMINARY SUMMARY OF BLIZZARD ON MARCH 13 2018... A blizzard occurred today at several locations across southeastern New England. The definition of a blizzard is that falling and/or blowing snow reduced visibility to below 1/4 mile along with sustained winds or winds that frequently gust to 35 mph or more...and that these are the predominant conditions for a period of 3 consecutive hours. When reviewing whether a particular observation location had blizzard conditions, we counted visibilities equal to 1/4 mile, since that is quite low for an automated visibility sensor to detect. Blizzard criteria were still occurring at some locations as of this writing, so durations will need to be finalized on Wednesday. At Boston, MA, blizzard criteria were met, starting at 830 AM. At Martha`s Vineyard, MA, blizzard criteria were met, starting at 800 AM. There was a 3-hour wind-data outage, but mesonet data at Vineyard Haven indicated continuous gusts at or above 35 mph during that period. At Marshfield, MA, blizzard criteria were met, starting at 855 AM. There was a wind-data outage between 915 AM and 1155 AM, but mesonet data from Duxbury were used as a proxy and indicated nearly continuous gusts at or above 35 mph during that time period. At Plymouth, MA blizzard criteria were met, starting at 732 AM and continuing through 1025 AM and likely beyond, but there was a prolonged data outage after that time. At Hyannis, MA blizzard criteria were met, starting at 730 AM. At Newport, RI, blizzard criteria were met, starting at 850 AM. $$ Field

Arctic Sea Ice Extent: · January Average: 12,527,690 square kilometers · 3rd consecutive year with a record low January average · Record low daily figures in January: 81% dates · February 1-26 average: 13,379,356 square kilometers (record low) · Record low daily figures in February: 88% of dates Source: JAXA dataset

Clearly, the rise of Social Media has made near real-time analyses and updates feasible. Many look forward to such fresh information. However, there is a real quality issue. Sensationalism is all too common (often with the most extreme model maps being posted for upcoming events). Plain misunderstanding of complex relationships is another one e.g., I recall one Twitter account was suggesting that a high-amplitude MJO event during June 2015 was unusual for what was a rising El Niño event when, in fact, during that time of year such events often take place during strengthening El Niños on account of shorter wave lengths. Overly deterministic assessments that ignore uncertainty is another matter. Having said this, on balance Social Media has been beneficial in the dissemination of meteorological information. But to realize such benefits, one needs to be able to differentiate between quality sources and others. Many who actively participate on various weather forums can readily differentiate. I'm not so sure the less engaged general public can.

Joe Lundberg is still listed on the Accuweather site: https://www.accuweather.com/en/personalities/joe-lundberg In addition, he is referenced on the WHUD radio site (noting his affiliation with Accuweather): http://www.whud.com/meet-the-whud-djs-joe-lundberg/ He simply might not be blogging any longer.

January 20 is rushing things. There should be some transient cold shots rather than unrelenting warmth during the thaw. The pattern evolution back toward a colder, snowier one should commence toward the end of January. The transition could take about a week.

The Euro should be interesting. Its 12z run was a rather large departure from its earlier runs and the relatively consistent GGEM.

Both the 0z NAM and GFS have taken a step toward the upper air pattern that has been shown on the GGEM.

40.0" snow, including 9.7" in December. February 11-12, 2006 saw 26.9" snow fall at Central Park, which was the Park's biggest snowfall on record until 27.5" fell on January 22-24, 2016. https://www.weather.gov/media/okx/Climate/CentralPark/BiggestSnowstorms.pdf

The latest date for the first reading in the 40s is October 20, which was set in 2005.

To date, New York City (Central Park) has had no minimum temperatures below 50°. Since 1869, only nine previous years saw the first sub-50° reading after October 10. A number of those winters saw average to above average snowfall. The relevant nine winters are below: 1898-99: 55.9” snowfall 1909-10: 27.2” snowfall 1910-11: 25.2” snowfall 1955-56: 33.5” snowfall 1969-70: 25.6” snowfall 1995-96: 75.6” snowfall 2002-03: 49.3” snowfall 2005-06: 40.0” snowfall 2007-08: 11.9” snowfall At this time, it is premature to reach firm conclusions about the upcoming winter.

It appears that the September 9 figure of 4,472,225 square kilometers (JAXA) could be this year's minimum sea ice extent. That would be the highest figure since 2014 when the minimum extent was 4,884,120 square kilometers.

Arctic sea ice extent is mirroring the evolution of the summer 2014 decline very closely. That would imply a minimum figure of between 4.4 million and 4.5 million square kilometers. https://s26.postimg.org/64xg85hrt/Arctic08292017.jpg

In March, Arctic sea ice extent averaged 13,679,429 square kilometers. That broke the March record low average of 13,729,002 square kilometers, which had been set in 2015. For the January 1-March 31 period, Arctic sea ice extent averaged 13,294,815 square kilometers in March. That set a new record low average for the first three months of the year. The previous record was 13,430,714 square kilometers, which was set last year.

During February, Arctic sea ice extent averaged 13,566,787 square kilometers. That set a new record low average for February. The previous record was 13,595,448 square kilometers, which was set in 2016. These figures all use a 2/1-28 timeline.

Lowest January Arctic Sea Ice Extent Averages: 1. 12,664,550 km2, 2017 2. 12,859,672 km2, 2016 3. 12,895,995 km2, 2011