OHweather

That convective looking band the models keep hinting at ahead of the cold front over extreme eastern IL into IN and southern MI looks interesting. Some decent PVA and lapse rates are almost steep enough for upright instability/CAPE through the DGZ. If it’s all snow (which it probably can be at least farther north?) it might be quite exciting for a time.

Since you asked, I do not agree with GRR's decision here. I think IWX boxing them in with a warning in their SW MI counties despite forecasting the exact same amounts of snow sums it up well. I am not sure why their advisory expires at 7 PM Monday when LES kicks in quickly Monday evening. GRR's southern counties will be getting heavy snow/wind during the rush with temps remaining very cold until later morning, worst conditions during and just after the rush. Then unlike northern IL they see squally lake effect snow showers with gusty winds and falling temps kick in immediately behind the storm Monday evening and lingering into Wednesday, which I think will just cause roads to just become snow packed as the cold weather sets in. The lake effect will also be good at reducing visibility as the cold lowers the DGZ below the clouds, resulting in a lot of small flakes falling with gusty winds. Not great for heavy accumulations but still will impact travel for an extended time in conjunction with winds chills getting close to their warning criteria. This all shoots down "how long it takes to get back to normal" criteria they mentioned earlier in the winter. Amounts hit criteria anyways. And it's high impact and prolonged. So I'll just leave it as I don't agree with GRR. It should probably be a long duration WSW through the day Tuesday at least, IMO.

A 6” fluffy synoptic snow falling over 10 hours with no wind on a Saturday can probably slide with no warning, but no mitigating factors here and a lot of compounding ones. I know MQT factors in ratios and may grudgingly put out an advisory for 6” of fluffy upsloped LES but will warn 6” wet synoptic. At least that’s what a tv met up there once told me. Hard to come up with flexible criteria that make sense for any possible given storm, but I don’t love the rigidity of the current criteria. Too many factors other than snow amount over a 12 or 24 hour period.

You personally didn't cancel anything, but the overwhelming tone was quite negative including from yourself. I never said you guys should be "grateful" for anything, but was quite surprised by the tone (I just happened to glance and see if anyone got snow last night) given the last two weeks have been quite a bit better than the 6 weeks prior and it's still early, and multiple indices are favorable moving forward. Like I said in my previous reply I can't tell anyone what they like or don't like...just was surprised at all the pessimism and certainly inquired as to why it's suddenly the feeling here. If you're going for 40-50" winters every year (and I know you and most who have been around for a while aren't) then sure, this winter won't get there, but there's still plenty of time left for snow and there has been more than dustings of snow recently. Hopefully you guys get something decent in February and make this all a moot discussion.

I've heard there's some debate and I'm sure both sides have merit...my lean is this should definitely be a warning, though given they just updated their grids to bump downtown Chicago to slightly over 6" and held with an advisory my guess is at this point there won't be an upgrade. I don't want to come off as looking for a reason to complain about a random NWS office. I discussed the Chicago forecast with the met putting it together at work late this afternoon and was surprised by no warning, and was wondering if anyone here was chiming in or not.

I'll freely admit that I've always been aggressive in terms of wanting to issue advisories/warnings for events that may not quite get to criteria but will have an impact and that not everyone agrees with it. But, I feel like this is a good case where an argument could be made for a Winter Storm Warning for another row of counties south in IL and include Chicago... 1) Amounts will push criteria anyways. 2) The snow will be moderate to heavy into the rush, and potentially through much of it. 3) It will be 10 degrees and breezy until the start of the commute. This along with rates will make roads a mess. Then after a high-impact, borderline warning criteria snow it shoots above freezing for a few hours and likely just drizzles, so everything starts compacting/melting, then the bottom falls out with gusty winds and snow showers in the afternoon, causing a lot of issues with stuff turning icy and roads/lots not cleared quickly enough becoming very hard to deal with. This is all followed by record cold. It's quite a storm. There may not be the conventional 80% confidence in 6"+ for a warning in Chicago, but I think there are a lot of complicating factors. This isn't to single out LOT as their snow amounts are fine, and by convention, their headline decision is fine (especially given an advisory already out and amounts only inching up a bit as their AFD mentioned), but is a broader argument that advisories/warnings, in general, should be more impact based.

I'm not going to disagree that the start of winter was awful for Ohio! Can't argue with 0.4" of snow at CMH in December. But, you're going to finish January slightly snowier than normal for the month, and as you pointed out that's after burning through the first week. Your characterization of those two storms is accurate for your backyard and Columbus in general but grosely under-represents what large portions of central and southern OH saw with each...many areas saw a warning criteria snow with at least one of them, and DAY and CVG are both above average to date on seasonal snowfall, let alone just for the month, and they also didn't do any better until January 12th-13th. And that's after literally nothing in December. So, after a poor December and perfectly acceptable January (argue if you wish, but by all metrics it's been anywhere from "acceptable" to "decent" snowfall wise depending on where you live, with colder than average temperatures after the first week) we have a frigid end to January. The first week of February looks poor. It will be generally mild for 5-7 days. After that the AO remains negative. There are signs the NAO goes negative. The MJO comes back around. I'd expect more cold and snow. I'll agree we've struggled to see cold lock in so far (though the last 3 weeks of January aren't far off), though the general consensus heading in was for a more backloaded winter. Argue the stratospheric warming event if you wish, but the AO drop occurred on schedule and big cold arrived on schedule, and oh it also turned snowier in mid-January, right on schedule for a roughly 2 week lag after the split happened. It is having an affect and will continue to. CMH will be a few inches in the hole by the second week of February, and I suspect it ends up being a few weeks of "typical" winter. Pretty cold, some snow, probably not "winter of yore"...I won't be exciting and call for above average snow for CMH, I think they finish at 20-25". It's a bit below average, but after a very poor December and first week of January is an ok second half of winter. I lean against CMH seeing a big storm that pushes them over average, but I suspect that's all it will take as there should be several light to moderate events from the second week of February on that gradually tack onto the seasonal total. I can't tell you what to like or not like and not, this probably won't be a winter that grandkids hear about, but it's shocking that after quickly catching up to almost normal snowfall (and at DAY and CVG blowing past it) after an awful start that a 10-12 day snowless stretch elicits calls to cancel winter...before February 1st...especially when there's nothing close to a prolonged torch showing up on the models. 5-7 mild/snowless days, absolutely, but I think by February 10th (and perhaps sooner) it's cooling back off with chances for snow returning. Probably not flashy but this isn't 97-98, 01-02, or 11-12 IMO, and the recent run (plus upcoming cold) demonstrates that, especially since there isn't a massive blow torch coming up to start February anyways.

I don’t disagree that the models have been horrible lately and they generally look less snowy as we get closer, it’s been the same here, but you’ve still gotten snow. It hasn’t been banner by any stretch and may not be meeting expectations for some, but it’s been “ok” with a lot of winter left. I suppose it’s been a few years since a truly good Ohio winter and we’re due for it, but weak El Niño’s are what they are for the Ohio Valley. Some have gone big but most don’t. If it still looks like crap in a week or two maybe it’s time to bring on Spring, but it is still early enough to get plenty of snow and then break for a decent spring by later March.

I’d argue the extended doesn’t look terrible...reshuffle in the pattern next week with 5-7 mild/snowless days and then it’s not even mid February with a -AO persisting. While a lot of your snow has come from unexciting events, that is literally climo for Ohio unfortunately and most of it has been recent. The storm two weekends ago was not an underperformer for central or southern or even northern Ohio. Many including myself got burned on how far north it rained last Saturday, but it was still a plowable snow and a lot of wind with the deform behind that. That’s two advisory to warning criteria snows on back to back weekends. It’s been wintry enough lately and there’s still a lot of time left. I just can’t find the will to feel bad for the Ohio crew after the last two weeks. I’d expect this sort of complaining from NYC or BOS where they’re at least significantly below average snowfall to this point, and tend to be more temperamental anyways.

I get that it hasn’t been a banner winter for many in Ohio and last weekend was unfortunate, but considering climo and how bad it was until two weeks ago...and how much time is left...it’s way too early to root on Spring IMO. It would be another thing if it was a month or month and a half later. I wouldn’t get excited for too much along the arctic front personally, if something can spin up ahead of that cold it’d be nice but seems like a long shot. But there’s still time after this week. The thing about a back loaded winter nowadays is everyone wants to cancel it before it gets a chance to be backloaded. It’s even worse in the Philly-NYC-Boston corridor where they’ve largely missed out the last two weeks (and Boston has been hilariously futile so far).

What am I missing? Isn’t most of central/southern Ohio near normal snowfall wise (some a little above, some a little below) with most of that falling in the last two weeks? The pattern also isn’t exactly warm coming up and it’s not even February 1 yet. It’s like reading a funeral in here because a surface low over toledo managed to bring sprinkles (it looks like the vast majority of your precip fell as snow with temps at or below feeezing north of Cincinnati and that maybe it briefly sprinkled). This wasn’t going to be more than an inch or so of snow anyways.

Yep. Unbelievable. I think the RGEM showed that though.

I still maintain that this, all around, has been one of the most frustrating storms I’ve had to forecast. The low is on the weaker side of pressure from what was modeled yesterday at this time but it’s just...warm. The deform band is very strong but has some holes as mentioned so may not blast everyone...but should bail some people out. This is a severe storm in northern OH where it’s been all snow. I’m still sweating the N NJ forecasts I made earlier today...last second indications are the southern edge may do a bit better here. Though I’ll hopefully be sleeping when it gets here.

I think with the last second amped trend and backend lake effect many of your will push or exceed a foot.

Someone’s going to be very unhappy. Sorry for the false optimism yesterday! Hopefully the deformation band still dumps on some of you. What a f*ckin storm. I’m beyond done with it.

I don’t personally know him but also follow him on Twitter. Hopefully you guys get plenty of snow!

That looks a lot like a Crankywx graphic ^ For NE OH ended up going with a broad 6-10" area. I think the heaviest snow does stay south both with the warm air advection push during the late morning and afternoon and with the evening deform...but, a prolonged period of favorable jet dynamics and isentropic lift causing upward motion in the dendrite growth zone should yield a prolonged period of light to occasionally moderate snow with good ratios. With modest lake effect on the back side through Sunday evening feel 6-10" is easily doable. If the evening deform band can trend a bit farther north can see how spots see over 10" farther north, but my current hunch is that doesn't happen...worth watching though. The WAA snow largely goes south of NW OH so expect lower amounts there.

It will likely get going over Indiana mid to late afternoon.

Given the aforementioned trend today for slightly lower heights ahead of the storm, allowing for a bit more cold air in front of it (and the likely under-modeling of low-level cold air seeping south) and the trend for a bit more amped/slightly slower vort (undoing some of the negative trends from yesterday) have made changes to my forecast. The trend for slightly colder air ahead of the storm makes sense given how intense that lobe of the PV is, and the trend for a slightly more amped storm as we approach is typical. Wouldn't surprise me if the GFS and CMC are still a bit too amped, but the Euro and UK have been rock-solid with their depictions and seem to offer a nice middle ground. The Euro has once again been the seemingly most consistent model over the last 2-3 days, so we'll see if its forecasts pan out. In terms of mixing/ice, the 850mb low track looks to be from about Cincinnati to Zanesville, however, the 700mb low track is well north of the region and there is a modest warm push as high as 700mb, so mixing likely does occur north of the 850mb low track for a time. This would bring mixing north of I-70. However, as the low wraps up during the afternoon and 850mb winds turn more E/NE the rain/snow line should shift back south of I-70. This likely cuts into Columbus's totals some, but it's not as bad as it could be. South of I-70 where the warm layer aloft will be deep enough for freezing rain instead of sleet, I'm pretty worried about a period of ice accretion. With brisk NE winds advecting in cool/dry low-level air, am not sure temperatures quickly shoot above freezing in this area as some models show. It will be kind of marginal for good accretion with heavy precip and borderline temperatures but given a good amount of precip falling as freezing rain in a narrow corridor can't rule out a tenth or two of accretion mainly in parts of SW OH north of the river and south of I-70. As winds pick up Saturday evening that could be problematic. As for snow amounts/placement, strongest mid-level forcing will generally be in central and southern Ohio, though a prolonged favorable dual jet structure and mid-level isentropic lift will allow for an extended period of light to moderate snow in northern Ohio that adds up to a few/several inches with some lake effect snow through Sunday from Mansfield points east. Two better periods of snow potential...one mid-morning through the afternoon on a push of strong mid-level warm-air advection/isentropic lift beneath the aforementioned upper-jet support and persistent PVA ahead of the shortwave. There is probably a period in the late afternoon/early evening when the precip shield becomes ragged for a time before a deformation band develops to the SW and moves through. The slowed nature of the storm on today's models increases the potential for this deform band to affect a good portion of Ohio outside of NW Ohio. The heaviest snow from the deform band looks to be from SW OH to central to east-central Ohio points east. The deformation band may be intense as models show intense mid-level frontogenesis on the backside of the storm as arctic air crashes in and deformation, along with strong PVA from the vort max and steepening lapse rates. The snow could be convective and the lapse rates may be steep enough for thundersnow. Snow rates of 1-2" per hour are likely. This feature is rather transient but can drop a fair amount in a short period of time. Essentially, given the lower heights ahead of the storm forcing a trough along/just south of the Ohio River did shift the heaviest axis outside of far northern Ohio. The area that will do best is the area that can cash in on both the morning-afternoon warm-air advection snow ahead of the storm (where it's mainly/all snow and not ice/rain) and that can get in on the heaviest evening deformation snows. Much of the I-70 corridor sees a mix for a portion of the first round but changes to snow and then gets something from the deform. Given both rounds (especially the deform) likely feature moderate to heavy rates, did shift 6-10" south to include Columbus and Dayton. East-central Ohio may see more WAA precip fall as snow and also gets in on the deform, so believed the model consensus of heavier amounts in that area. I can see how someone farther west sees 10 or 12" too if the snow/ice line can set up a little farther south, perhaps between Dayton and Columbus, but not sure on that. Far southern Ohio will get hit decently by the deform band and I believe it'll be heavy, so went with decent snows all the way through. The flash freeze combined with a period of moderate to heavy snow and gusty winds will make for nasty travel in that area Saturday night.

Ugh

In terms of this upcoming storm for OH, can't really imagine better trends across the board today. Slightly lower height in front of the storm due to a little bit more cold seeping in from the north, but also a slower, sharper southern shortwave on every model except for the NAM. The NAM is still a bit of red flag, but the trend in general supports the snow/mix line setting up a little farther south and also more QPF.

I liked the cold idea yesterday and bailed on it today...regretting it at the moment! What's good is this also bumped up my totals a few hundred miles east too.

Had the brief thought a couple of years ago...due to various reasons went with the much safer option of just working for a well-established company instead. Certainly fun to think about though.

That's a lot like what the Euro's been trying to sell on the NAM...though a bit quicker so a little less QPF.

Yes. Can't complain about it coming out of college, and it's much easier to get into the private sector than say the NWS or broadcast.