That is UTZ in the Upper right of the pic.
In what would likely be the most controversial of the options, alternative 2 would replace the intersection with a two-lane roundabout.
While the most expensive option, at $2.926 million, alternative 2 showed the greatest benefit to traffic safety and congestion, according to the presentation. This option would also have the highest impact on surrounding properties, with eight properties displaced by the construction.
By 2045, a roundabout would cut congestion to less than half of the estimated delays from any of the other proposals, according to the numbers shared in the presentation.
At peak p.m. congestion by 2045, the estimated delays per vehicle would only be around 6 seconds.
Planners found that a two-lane roundabout had significant improvements over a single-lane roundabout, Caba said.