Jump to content

Damage In Tolland

Members
  • Posts

    111,298
  • Joined

Everything posted by Damage In Tolland

  1. Lol.. I could have sworn you said it was over after 2.7 there
  2. Lol .. not you no. I didn’t mean you. The guilty know who they are. I was bullish on 4-8” statewide based on exactly what you just stated. If one looked past snow maps and looked at fronto and forcing one could see that being signaled the last couple days. I thought the NAM (while having some high outputs) and the HREF mean showed the overall idea the best. These coastals almost always have that . I just think overall it was a pretty poor performance by the globals as a whole. I’m enjoying the beer out of this today!
  3. I’ll kindly disagree . They were the only output showing the heavy Banding farther west. Everything else had SE Mass as ground zero. You even had Mets this morning saying “ take em down” “ we downgrade “ etc. Globals were putrid
  4. The north tip of the band has tickled me . Instead of the 2” per hour , I’ve had 1”-1.5” hour . Which is fantastic
  5. Ryan just took a core. 2.7” and 0.12. 23:1 ratio .. and he has been nw of best banding
  6. Actually it’s north and south if one looks past snow maps . They made that mistake yesterday
  7. Yeah agree Tippy. Just not enough impetus to get into warning levels . Minimal forcing. You can envision a big area of light to moderate snow , but not great snow growth.. so you slowly pile up 3-6” of sand . A Ray favorite
  8. You’re not running anything that far north. I mean I suppose you could have a snow to ice deal but with everything else snow to the coast.. toss it until other stuff shows it. Nam does better with coastals qpf issues aside . This is just overrunning basically
  9. Looks like a solid 3-6” event for pretty much all of SNE
  10. You’re in Winsted right? I always initially think WAterbury with your screen name
  11. I’m going 8-10 IJD to Ginx .. That area is ground zero
×
×
  • Create New...