Jump to content

moneypitmike

Members
  • Posts

    30,375
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by moneypitmike

  1. That was actually his first-call (I thought it was his first-guess, though I'm not sure what that difference is)>
  2. Too bad it tracks the low over Bob's head.
  3. I just don't see this being a huge area of ice-impact. Speaking for SNE, I'm thinking sleet-fest anywhere north of the Pike. That will progress toward ice somewhere south of the pike. Is it between the Pike and northern CT or perhaps even that will be ip and the ice will be more sort of south of 84/north of the Merit deal. I'm thinking Ray's map, but shift it 30 miles south.
  4. While I'll certainly be following it, I'm with Dave in being a little tired of this event. I think this will be essentially one for CNE. Some inconsequential sleet and ice in MA and some decent snow--albeit tainted with ip--through NH and western ME through the mid-coast (with more taint on the latter if the secondary tracks more tightly).
  5. Does it seem to anyone else like December has been an interminable month? Perhaps just because of the early-month systems. Either way, I finally get an watch--and it's for ice, not snow. This map doesn't scream damage. Is that simply because it's only our to 7:00p.m. on 12/30?
  6. What's the deal with the cutter? Are you CG or is that a reference to your storm hopes?
  7. This would be nice. Lots of esthetic beauty with no big issue with power, etc. At least if there are power interuptions, there's no real cold once it pulls out.
  8. I think that's the GEM, the EC is the other map. Correct me if I'm wrong.....while this says accumulated, isn't it actually the total rainfall while the temp is below freezing not the anticipated accretion? Speaking of which....how are the modeled rain rates of this? I know for big ice one doesn't want it too heavy unless it's damn cold.
  9. What a torch next weekend on the Euro, 180-hour caveat.
  10. What's the best free site for EC that's more frequent than 24-hour increments? Thanks!
  11. Part 2 could be healthy though not for SNE. We each get one though....I'd prefer your snow.
  12. Not quite the 'woah', but solid reaction from Jerry and Scott.
  13. How we long for the "woah!!!" comments about how cold it's shifted rather than the 'ticks' comments. Sort of like the pre- Boxing Day GFS.
  14. It consistently has. A nice continuation of winter for Dave and Chris/points northeast
  15. This system could at least lessen your deficit.
  16. Thank God. The remaining ice from the last system's sleet is nearly melted from my walkway. It needs some replenishing.
  17. I'd be most concerned from a plumbing standpoint. We have a gas (heating) stove so at least our family room would remain warm. Our main heating is gas/steam heat and we have a tankless hot water system. I imagine the latter two require electricity to run but I'm not sure. Even in GC we managed to get into the cold. Not as much as eastern areas, but I was impressed by how we held below freezing.
  18. 2.8". Seriously, I think you will get that. I do think the ice-angst for areas below RT 2 and certainly south of the Pike is overdone. Could there be some? I Sure, but I think the low-level cold will come in less so as this ticks back north. Further, Wineminster's comment on the lack of antecdent cold will mitigate icing potential. Bottom line, I'm echoing my earlier post and there will be much lament over the cold rain.
×
×
  • Create New...