weatherwiz

I remember too a while back reading some research into how there seems to be a pretty decent link between how these Pacific teleconnectors evolve and Atlantic teleconnectors, however, there were some major questions/lack of understanding...some believed if that understanding could be solved we could long-range forecast with great accuracy. There is also this one index...I think it's the Pacific-Transition (PT)...it's like a fall signal with data only available between Sept - Nov or maybe Sept - Dec...but some research showed a very high correlation to the fall phase of this index and winter pattern over the CONUS.

That's a part of the glob where I would really like to focus on more weather wise. I think having a strong understanding/background on how short-term weather is performing across this area of the globe (this includes how the jet is behaving) can significantly increase medium (maybe even into the long-term spectrum...depending on what your definition is separating medium/long-term) range weather forecasting across the CONUS. But the WPO is a great place to start...I've been thinking of doing alot of stuff with NAO/AO...but I kinda want to revert and focus more on the western Pacific region. Isn't there some sort of (strong) correlation between behavior of the jet there and how it will respond here (like a 10-14...or 14-18 day lag)? Low east Asian MT anomalies/AAM anomalies eventually result in low Rocky mountain MT/AAM anomalies down the road = trough digging through the west?

That's a very good point..and further emphasizes the reasoning of why we BD more frequently during the transition seasons. Very interesting too about eastern Asia/Japan...that would probably explain why that area is a major area of interest for those who monitor MT?

I wouldn't mind snow/cold into April...I mean the last time that happened we had a monster severe wx outbreak only a month later. 2018 was wild...I think we even had snow showers down in Danbury around mid-April. I've always wondered this (I think I kinda had done some research with this a while back) but I would think we stand a better chance of having an active/early start to convective season if we're colder deeper into spring.

Most of my cardio comes during the summer when I'm running between inside and outside when t'storms are coming

These past couple of cold shots have been pretty decent. Looks like we can continue seeing brief cold shots well into March so perhaps something can just time right for once

I've been wanting to diet better but just haven't done it. Just have to strap down and come up with something and just do it.

I use styling wax...no more gel. Just run the fingers through the hair and do the magic. But yup...always cold. In fact, I wonder if something is causing my body temperature to be low. When I went to urgent care last month for my stomach they took my temperature (what a fancy tool too) and it was like 98.2 or 98.1...maybe that's why I'm always cold. I think I have poor circulation. But no way you'd catch me outside in a tee shirt in this cold.

It was brutal this morning when I left. I was pissed too b/c I didn't put a sweatshirt on under my jacket. I had already started doing my hair and realized I forgot to put my sweatshirt on...I was so pissed.

Time to start gearing up towards summer!! Any thoughts on May/June out in the Plains in terms of the pattern? I hope to God we don't see a massive ridge build in the central U.S. otherwise I'll be a bit upset.

+10000000000

This!!! It would be freaking awesome if someone who had the skill really divulged into the data and did some extensive research. For example, looking at periods where a phase change occurred and determining the percentages a storm occurred during a phase change...or a transition period. Or how many storms producing > "x" amount of snow (choosing climate locations for data source) occurred when positive or negative....and just so forth. The list can go and go. All of these results can be used to vastly increase medium/long range forecasting.

I love you!!

Yes...although I've been having trouble accessing them. When clicking the link it directs to a bunch of folders and when clicking on the daily values it wants to open up something and the computer can't recognize the file or something. But I wish the process would be as easy as taking 7-days worth of numbers, adding, then dividing lol. One time for hahas I added up all the daily values for January 1950 and divided by 31 and checked if it equaled the Jan 1950 value...nope

Tat's what made that 2018 block all the more special...for the longevity of it that NAO pattern didn't become stale (like 2010)...it kept regenerating and supplying the goods. More often than that when a particular feature holds dominance for an extended period things become "stale"...not in March of 2018

EXACTLY!!! I'm not a fan of just having a monthly averaged value...and to extend on this not a big fan of just looking at the averaged 500 pattern for the month either. You aren't going to capture any transition periods and it's the transition periods where a weather event is likely to occur. This is precisely I would love to use the daily data and construct a weekly/bi-weekly index but that will never happen. Unless I just do it simply and take 7 and 14-days worth of values, add them, then divide by the period (7 or 14 days) but that isn't going to be accurate...I don't think. then with these values can further analyze height anomalies, etc.

This is something which is more important (IMO) then just having a flat out -NAO in place for an extended period. Would much rather see the NAO undergoing transition (preferably positive to negative)

Let the Carolina's get the snow now and we can get their severe wx this summer

It's going to be super close...definitely probably not going to be a widespread event, but despite all the shifts and uncertainties one thing which has been pretty consistent is the area getting hit pretty good where the WSW is up. But looks like the system is going to end up a bit flatter which is going to hurt quite a bit.

Anyone know what's been going on with bufkit and the completely unrealistic levels of dry air?

If we can't get snow they shouldn't be able to get it either (:

That early week wave could have a huge say in things. The airmass for much of next week is quite warm..perhaps if that early week wave comes weaker/flatter that will mute the air mass a bit...but it just seems like it might be another system with crappy airmass and then after the storm (end of week) we get the cold

Good luck man! Keep your head up

Ahhh yes that’s it!!! I want to go through there

do you know the name of this town in RI that is supposedly Haunted? It’s like just over the CT/RI border I think along route 6