weatherwiz

gotcha...I was very confused for a second haha.

yeah I'll do without a sub 970 low please...hell I'll do without sub 980

I'm confused with this. Are you saying you think the GFS will eventually come more NW? If so, that's what I was referring to

Getting a nice, steady light snow shower

Going to go with what my professor talked about with this past storm and how the GFS tends to be too far south and east with developing low pressures with Arctic boundaries around. GFS tends to develop them more towards the warmer side of the boundary (or a bit south and east of the boundary) when the reality is they tend to develop right along the Arctic boundary. Models can struggle with Arctic boundaries because the depth of the Arctic cold is on the shallower side

I would lean towards the 12z GFS being too far south and east

It was really difficult to get a final measurement because once the winds picked up the snow began blowing around. When I measured around 7:30 (had 11.5") and went back out before bed around 9:30, there was minimal additional accumulation and that's during the period when the winds started picking up. But judging by how it continued to snow through I went to bed I have to say the total was about 13-14". Depth is probably very close to 18".

The end of the driveway probably has 3-4 feet of snow. I almost don't even want it touched, it's like a Van Gogh painting; master artwork. You just want to stare at it, and admire it and think dirty thoughts

Oh absolutely. Just pointing it out more for the science behind the scenes aspect. So this isn't anything to knock down or play down the storm or intensities ordeal but it just goes to show how extremely difficult it is to get a storm where you have a consistent ratio. Now, at the end of the day, total wise it may not truly matter (except when talking about very high end stuff)...so it was a factor in why we didn't see widespread 20-30" type stuff but for those forecasting it's something that really needs to be given thought when making a forecast. We all won on this one

I was watching some map discussion video lectures from my professor last night which he posted Thursday and Friday doing model analysis. In his discussion from Thursday he talked about several things which hinted that not only the storm would take on a more northerly track but why the GFS initially was a bit far south and east than some of the other guidance was at the time. He pointed things out in model guidance Thursday and gave his opinion on how he thought the storm would unfold and he was pretty spot on.

I am not shocked about this really. Using the obb method on bufkit you could see the snow ratio line looking like that of a seismograph when there's an Earthquake lol. On any profile, there never really was a good consistent duration where snow ratio was constant...it was very jumpy.

Bring it on...let's let the remainder of winter go out with a bang.

Two weeks ago winter was cancelled because the "lack of snow cover". My oh my how things can change. Only takes one storm to switch the tune

Just such a massive area, well into NY/NJ/PA. Imagine if we could get one or two of these every winter

What a day, what a night. This is beautiful and everyone won