Jump to content

OceanStWx

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    19,778
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by OceanStWx

  1. The thing about Kuchera is that somebody may pull off 20:1 underneath the main deformation band (which you can clearly see form and pinwheel away from the low center in the loop farther up the thread). So those totals are representative of the max amount SOMEONE may see. It's obviously too broad an area on this map, but gives you an idea of what the modeling has trended towards today.
  2. It's pretty close up here that the 10th percentile is actually my best event of the season so far. Obviously I'm putting it all on red though and hoping for something bigger.
  3. The main issue is that a consensus forecast is almost always better than an individual forecast. And that goes for models too. A single GFS or Euro op run may occasionally beat the ensemble, but more often than not it won't. Even for dynamic situations it will offer a range of solutions more likely to capture the end result.
  4. Here's a visualization from Alicia Bentley, who has done a ton of work with the GFS. You can see the GEFS are at least as useful as the op through day 3/4 then it becomes clear the ensembles are better. Obviously an ensemble mean high temp may not be particularly good on day 2, but for the upper levels there's skill still.
  5. You can see it pretty well with the QPF density functions from the 00z EPS. At the lower end (yellow arrow) the values have actually gotten lower than previous runs. But at the higher end (red arrow) the values have gotten higher than the last run. So the bad members are getting worse, and the good members are getting better.
  6. Just speaking about the EPS, the 10th percentile for you has moved to 0 over the last two days, but the 90th percentile has moved up to 14. Like Ryan has said, the spread has actually increased. I don't know about the Euro/EPS specifics, but at least with the GFS/GEFS the ensembles on average typically provide a better forecast for day 2 even. 24 hours is pretty much op or bust time for the GFS.
  7. As others have mentioned it looks like two clusters in the EPS, which could be increasing spread despite there only being two "right" answers. To me it looks like the EPS got a little worse aloft in the mean, so I would expect probabilities and whatnot to come down slightly. Or the day shift was only 50% confident you might get 6 inches.
  8. I mostly stick to the Cobb on there too. Locally (PWM) it looks like the EPS has been steadily trending lower with QPF for the last 5 runs. 90th percentile only changed about 3 inches (17 to 14 inches give or take), but the 10th percentile (basically expect at least that much) went from 5 inches to 0. Shows you how the lead pipe lock has been taken off the table.
  9. I would honestly be fine if step 3 was just keep the ratio 12:1 Cobb for those that don't know uses temp, RH, and lift to determine a snow ratio. Not perfect but probably the most scientific.
  10. Really deepens the 700 mb low right over the tip of the Cape. Just stacks all the upper lows right there. That would be tremendous forcing, so no wonder it gets precip back to the CT River up here.
×
×
  • Create New...