Jump to content

OceanStWx

Meteorologist
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    20,178

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by OceanStWx

  1. OceanStWx
    I think he gave you the 1st number in Merrimack too. ME1.
  2. OceanStWx
    PWM actually has 2.5" officially since midnight, so that's 9th snowiest.
  3. OceanStWx
    I don't know why it drops out of the PNS sometimes.
  4. OceanStWx
    Looks like PWM has climbed into the 9th snowiest March already. This is also probably the 2nd snowiest week in March.
  5. OceanStWx
    In fairness, in my hierarchy of reports I put general public before social media. In extreme cases when someone doesn't go to spotter training (@dendrite), we'll just give them a spotter number and enter it on our own when we see the report on a message board.
  6. OceanStWx
    This one's going to knock me out of the office snow pool. I threw a 90" guess this season, and GYX is currently at 81.5" before this storm is counted.
  7. OceanStWx
    Our CON observer was like 9.5" on 0.45" in the 6 hours before 7.
  8. OceanStWx
  9. OceanStWx
    I mean QPF is pretty bunk from models in general, but can be either too broad (this storm) or too terrain influenced. Interesting to see even at 18z, the NAM had a low level inversion around 3-3.5 kft that could have focused some orographic differences, but the GFS had none (or nothing as strong as the NAM).
  10. OceanStWx
    I didn't see any 30" 5 day total in their record, so it really won't matter.
  11. OceanStWx
    Wrong Raymond. NH (not North Haven either).
  12. OceanStWx
    It kind of is, it would be the snowiest week for the Durham Coop. Records back to the 1890s.
  13. OceanStWx
    Sliding into his DMs?
  14. OceanStWx
    Fat flakes need love too.
  15. OceanStWx
    Well I think there's a very small chance that anyone south of Kittery sees 5 more hours averaging 2.5/hr.
  16. OceanStWx
    You almost never see 4/hr in a widespread sense. Maybe I could consider it on a county level, but within the whole band, no. We've had some reports of 8 and 9" in 3 hours so far, but 3.6 in 60 min was the highest report we've received.
  17. OceanStWx
    It should still rip in the band. The question is whether you can pull off much more than an hour under it as it starts to pull east. If you assume 1 to 3/hr, that gives you maybe 2-4, 3-6 in the most optimistic scenario.
  18. OceanStWx
    21 bun salute.
  19. OceanStWx
    Spring training for summertime sadness.
  20. OceanStWx
    Looks like it could be a top 10 type storm for ASH-MHT
  21. OceanStWx
    Check out the mid level WV loop. You can really see some vortices ripping back westward north and west of the main surface low, in the shear zone of the cold conveyor. I love me some GOES-16.
  22. OceanStWx
    Mid level magic FTW. 700-500 f-gen seems a good proxy for this band right now, and the RAP is only slow to pull that east over the next several hours.
  23. OceanStWx
    Saw that, but 5 min obs show it's been less than predominate. Sort of dumb luck with the top of the hour being at criteria.
  24. OceanStWx
    It actually takes a crap load of work to weed out the bad reports and reports that make the map look stupid. So resources are better used updating the forecast, briefings, and taking in reports. It's a treat that BOX even puts the effort in mid storm.
  25. OceanStWx
    It's harder when we don't own the trees.
×
×
  • Create New...