Jump to content

Ralph Wiggum

Members
  • Posts

    16,089
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ralph Wiggum

  1. Do the GEFS get the additional recon flight data like the GFS has been receiving?
  2. Nah, I havent even had coffee yet. Kids are off on a school ski club trip. Distractions are lessened. But ty for noticing. The GFS op took that track (right over or just east of.phl) that you and I both laid out last night on where we thought the surface weaknesses should have been tracking this yesterday, so the nudge finally appeared. Interesting.
  3. Improvements on the ICON track fwiw. GEFS look amazing....textbook. Lost all the western members. BIG changes coming with today's runs. Buckle up:
  4. GEFS lost all of the Western members at 6z. The mean slp is perfect. If I didnt see the op continually run this thing thru Harrisburg PA I would think the GEFS was honking a MECS from DC-BOS. This is good......real good:
  5. Bunch of 980s east probably skewing it?
  6. Around 84-96 hours the ens begin to not be as useful and we begin looking at the lr mesos.
  7. I know the GEFS aren't made for thermals per se, but fwiw the mean does keep the surface at or below 32 the duration in DC.
  8. Thats a really classic looking jet structure. :
  9. Looks like the buck west stopped at least with the 18z suite. The GEFS are drool worthy for some in the subforum: Definite lean to the se with the ull.
  10. Yep, cluster off coast, cluster inside.
  11. There have to be some members that follow the weakness though, from Greenville up over Philly looks like where it probably wanted to end up. Dynamics as it stacks likely cause interference of convective nature out closer to where the surface low ended up this run.
  12. Probably wiser to pay more attention to the 500mb changes at this range and not so much r/s lines and amounts just yet. We saw some positive things all around at 18z. Now we rest up for Dr No in a couple hours.
  13. The key this run and 18z is weaker less organized sw that gains more longitude before getting tugged N. Not concerned with where the surface low ends up....im not sure that is correct. Eta: willing to bet 0z the surface corrects itself with a move E
  14. Ends up a tick farther W. Thats unpossible
  15. Liking the looks of that sprawled out 'banana high'.
  16. Go GooFuS! Not closed off thru 66 this time. Less organized/consolidated. Better look. All we can ask for right now. Just cease that farther W movement each run.
  17. See my post above....I think if we can delay the closed low and and phasing that only improves our chances for the sw to track east of the fall line.
  18. Looks ICON ish wrt how it wants to link a bit of the energy in the plains with the stj energy. Not sure honestly what it would mean. Less of a closed low for longer would be better, so I guess there are some positives just glancing at where it may head after.
  19. NAM at 78 but has a weaker sw and more of a connection to the stj and energy sitting off the southwest coast.
  20. I think the thump will be fine. I do agree that the flip is looking more likely now. Seeing those SE low level winds roaring at tropical storm force wont help those east of the fall line. Again tho, get the sw to phase a little later to allow the low to traverse more longitude before running NNE would be huge in terms of precip types and changeover.
×
×
  • Create New...