Is everything below average a rat? I'd have to do a JSpin standard deviation calculation (which I'm not capable of) and put it those terms to figure it out. I average around 100" per year here but if I got to 80" or 85" and had coverage for the vast majority of the year, it may not be great but I couldn't call it a rat. Last year, I got about 110" but there was a lot of melting and bare ground. That's closer to a rat than the first situation, at least to me.