Jump to content

nj2va

Members
  • Posts

    13,694
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by nj2va

  1. @WxUSAF mentioned that earlier. It seems like our goal posts are narrowing around here but look at the variances near NYC/Coastal NJ. Fun forecasting for the mets up there!
  2. The 6z Euro dropped 40” on my parents house in coastal NJ, lol. That’s pretty crazy.
  3. We’re gaining almost 2 minutes of sunlight/day - big fan of that.
  4. Through h83 on the 6z Euro, the 0.5” QPF line is inching towards 95 on the eastern side of the Beltway.
  5. It seems like the general 1-4” that has been consistently showing up on the models the last several days (ignoring ICON ofc) is coming into focus as we get under 72H. The Eastern Shore of MD and DE look to be the bullseye where 4-8”+ is becoming more likely. We’re within 48 hours from first flakes in western MD (and 60 hours for most of the area) so the finer details of amounts/etc will start getting worked out.
  6. Assume the 1-3/2-4 solutions will be reality. Easier to keep the expectations in check.
  7. 2-4” for most on the GFS. More out west and on the ES.
  8. It’s got the Friday HH snow. Breaks out early Friday morning in the far western areas. Friday afternoon/evening for most of the area.
  9. I put RGEM up there with ICON in terms of useless models. Not discounting a potentially further east solution but they’re way down on the useful list for me.
  10. I gotta say that NAM run was fun…reminded me of the pure joy during the Jan 2016 tracking.
  11. I’m in the camp that even if H84 were the total accumulations, it’d be a great storm here. It’s not like we live on Tug Hill where we average 300” — a 3-6” event is fun. NAM suggests more to come though.
  12. IDGAF what the surface shows. I’d take this 500 look any day. But…the NAM.
  13. Not going to lie, having model runs to look forward is making working late tonight on some deliverables much more manageable. Trying to bang as much out as possible for the NAM (can't believe I just said that).
  14. A bit more falls Leesburg east after this (more as you head towards the ES)
  15. I actually thought that was a good run and I like the NS energy diving in as it was more potent. A few minor adjustments and it would have been even bigger. Considering we were starting at 0.0” and that run dropped 5” for I-95 through H90, thats a big win.
  16. There’s way more energy rounding the base of the trough at 84 vs 90 though. And 18z closes off at 90 (like 12z did at 96).
  17. Is that feature swinging down from Canada and phasing on the back end helping with the trough orientation? It seems its trending towards sharper/deeper and negative quicker. All things that will help us
×
×
  • Create New...