We want a rapidly occluding dying primary that's how this works. As far as people calling the backside an ivt . I see the forcing and energy from the primary rushing east not an INVT. Could it all go to shit? Sure but let's not get in the game of predicting what a model.will do. We have solid consensus today over 6 model suites. Hard to argue that all models are missing something.
They are scared of the primary and most of those posts are out of area. I can think of many good snows with a dying primary the Lakes. Shit 1888 had a 1004 over Lake Superior. As long as confluence continues and the best model show a storm I am all in.
I don't get these skeptical posts. Are you not looking at the evolution ,the confluence, the antecedent conditions, the huge amount of low dewpoints and cold air pumping in. Models are all showing the same thing.