Ginx snewx

1 hour ago, CoastalWx said:

We grow here now. Frost and freezes are done. Thank you spring and CC!

CC? Good luck with that after this week. 

Euro weeklies ignored but Euro 8 month super el Nino accepted, and ACATT has an agenda? 

1 hour ago, Damage In Tolland said:

Yup. They’re straight trash . Indicies mean Jack dick once out of Winter 

Weeklies have 4 weeks in a row BN starting the 20th following the Neg Nao theme with well below normal heights for New England 

16 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Aside from the fact, the critique is misplaced.   We in the Met and Climate community, who are not assholes and/or just fucking morons, already are aware that the oceans have absorbed 90+% of the warming that began actually since the Industrial Revolution. The oceans are intrinsic as a heat sink and modulator.   Therefore, representing these warming(cooling ) graphics, respectively, already has that consideration embedded geo-physically.  

 

We all know the earth is warming. No shit. Point being since 1995 combined with ocean its slower than what you posted I can manipulate data too Tip. Why the random 1950 to 2020? Let's be real  you were looking for maximum effect in your post. I am one of the few who actually read your soliloquy daily, as you noted to Wiz earlier. Its not the first time you post random maps with no explanation 

1 hour ago, Typhoon Tip said:

I did not use it incorrectly.

Those are the straight up global anomalies, using an expanded data set because in scientific principle, denser sample sizes are better - when also stretched out over the longer term, exposes trends that have more confidence.

UNLIKE what you are providing in your poorly thought out rebuke, using scanter sizes. 

Ocean temps don't matter I guess. 

54 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

2007-2016? 

Ssts are 07 to 16 earth temps are 95 to 2025

45 minutes ago, powderfreak said:

Why would that be better than going from 1950 onward like Tip’s original post?

41 minutes ago, SouthCoastMA said:

It wouldn't 

Because sst datasets start in 2002 . Saying how much the earth warmed should include the ocean 

6 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

Thanks!! I feel like I had this site bookmarked at one point but probably lost it when something happened with my bookmarks. Curious if they will roll over to ERSSTv6 at some point

They have v6 and v7 options 

7 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

Thanks!! I feel like I had this site bookmarked at one point but probably lost it when something happened with my bookmarks. Curious if they will roll over to ERSSTv6 at some point

Notice when you combine land and sea anomalies and use a 1995 to 2025 climo base Tips anomaly for March drops from .9 to .04. Data use is important but data can be sometimes not used correctly 

Just now, weatherwiz said:

Wow, I totally missed that. I'll have to read some more into it. I wonder if this CORe is just a more improved dataset?

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/maps/

Just now, weatherwiz said:

was going to try and create a composite comparing March to 1971-2000, 1981-2010, and 1991-2020 climo but March 2026 not available yet on the reanalysis page. Also just found out that NCEP/NCAR R1 is being discontinued

11 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Welp ... I was wrong about March when it comes to predicting the product result, below.  I had presumed recently that we'd result a more obvious local geographic ( 'local' relative to the whole world) cool zone/island anomaly relative to the whole "inferno" that is clearly and coherently, unarguably the product's character below... eh hm.  Said island had been a persistent leitmotif since late last autumn... 

Still, you know, it really didn't sensibly come off that way?  I recall seeing March colder than the whole country - in fairness I think what is actually going on is that this product below is the "anomaly".  What we experience was a warm anomaly, but just not as demonstrative or obviously so as everywhere else... SO, in that vein and sense it might still qualify.  hmm  'Sides,   I've been quite right about every other month since October...so, meh.  That's a decent grade in anticipating these temperature layouts, nonetheless.   Also, having that impressively deep cold garland lording over top the Canadian Shield while there's a quasar spanning the conterminous U.S., definitely helps explain why we've been getting these wild 40 to as much as 50+ F air mass whiplashes, too.

Anyway, here is the tabulation and mean for March provided by https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/maps/

Versus 1951 to 2020 who picked these random years

24 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

No one watches or cares about the women 

Sacrilege 

2 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

My sympathies...

Yes come July when you are 95/72 and I am 82/65 sitting on the open ocean with a sea breeze  I will absolutely think of your sweating day.

18 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Still light ...

Now 53, with high sun.  

Affect achieved.

Gusting mid 20s here can feel the Ocean temperature.

14 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

classic April temperature recovery ...

DP ?            1       4     

...whilst it climbs toward 60 (probably). 

So, in fairness, splendor out of doors, considering what this loathsome time of year is capable of doing.  If the wind remains light and doesn't get to wafty, then we get our 56 MOS + the typical 2 tick bust ... it will seem like a guilty bargain out there.  Take this and run

Zero chance the wind remains light. 

1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I wouldn't be so sure.

Remember the epic fails over the years during the spring barrier. I remember very well some not so much. 

13 hours ago, Typhoon Tip said:

The (not so) sci-fi version of this El Nino...

It will rise to historic proportions, but ... no one saw the bigger issue coming - though in retrospect, really should have. Why? because it already happened once, in 2023.  The whole planet surged, by almost .4 C spanning a 2.5 month period that spring, brining the planet perilously close to the theorized threshold of +1.5 C  over the IR.   Only this time ... by a whole degree C       Such that not only are we at 2.5 over the Industrial Revolution entry mean, it is so crazy warm that relative ONI renders almost meaningless outside of the immediate tropical atmosphere.  Vaguely coupling to the mid latitude pattern ( meaning weakly correlating)   

It's going to be the first panic year of this ongoing CC explosion, which just moves slower than human perception - geologically?   It's detonating.  

0 summer ice in 5 years.  

Roth slides into the ocean...   Global tsunamis claims a billion lives

Panic lol what a doomer

Trace on the deck 

https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/how-capicola-became-gabagool-the-italian-new-jersey-accent-explained

Nice 

50 minutes ago, ineedsnow said:

In Agawam up to 81 now my grandfather passed away this morning but we knew it was coming so kind of hard to be out enjoying it.. 

Sorry man 

3 minutes ago, Brian5671 said:

Love these warm busts.  Topped out at 80 here-down to 76 now with some more clouds

Fully solar now system went live an hour ago 

11 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

Only 40 degrees warmer here…holy smokes what a difference. 

GWLH

On 3/30/2026 at 10:35 AM, tamarack said:

That mid-March storm was remarkable both for the amounts in NNE and the relatively modest barometer.  We'd had a very strong HP in the 2 days prior to the snow, and the pressure was still about 30.40" when flakes arrived at 9 PM on 3/13.  We had 22" from 6A-8P on the 14th as pressure slowly lowered to 30.05".  Rates peaked at 3"/hr 11A-1P, right when Fort Kent school admin decided to close schools at noon.  All students got home safely, even those from Winterville, 25 miles and 2 major hills south from FK.

My records for that storm (obs time 9 PM so nothing on the 13th):
3/13   10   -18     0        0     46    (Allagash had -32)
3/14   12      2   2.08  25.0   65
3/15   28    10   0.10     1.5    64

We had to retrieve a disabled snowmobile a couple miles south from Estcourt Station on the 15th.  I found the depth was 80" there, presumably several inches less than when accumulation had stopped.

Wow 80 inches is sick