Jump to content

Syrmax

Members
  • Posts

    5,654
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Syrmax

  1. Per 3K NAM soundings...KSYR gets about 20 hours above freezing but max is 37-38F for about 6 hours or so with rain. Then a 4-6 hour window for postfrontal snow (~3").  Not ideal but won't be a large scale meltdown especially with a higher density snow depth in place.  Probably cut snow depth by a 1/4 - 1/3rd at worst.  Then we glacier. 

    • Like 1
  2. 1 minute ago, OSUmetstud said:

    Its a great synoptic storm pattern for the interior i think. Lots of cold and a displayed but deformed pv. If you blocked everything up on the atlantic side youd probably have a storm track too far east for most of the forum. There is the occasional risk of warm ups and rain of course. 

    We were all moaning and groaning about the modeled pattern 10 days ago, and how arid it looked...until this past weekend's storm showed up on modelling. 

    Looks like a parade of clipper type systems as it stands now over next 10 days. Which wouldn't be bad.

  3. 1 hour ago, CNY-WXFREAK said:

    00Z this evening NNW winds kick in and aligned with ample RH and Omega so whoever get under whatever develops could in fact be better than what we just went through, lol!

    rap_2019012013_012_43.23--76.26.png

    Looks even better 3 hrs later, wow! Lapse rates throught the roof cap 7-8000K!  Snow growth the whole way down!

    rap_2019012013_014_43.23--76.26.png

    Cool sounding.  Only issue is, look where the SGZ is...practically on the deck.  Flakes produced in a narrow, low SGZ tend to be crappy needles and such, not decent dendrites. I think KBUF and KBGM notes this in AFDs earlier.

    • Like 2
  4. 3 minutes ago, CNY-WXFREAK said:

    I'll never post another Kuchera garbage map so don't ever ask again, lol!  They almost never pan out thats why their called clown maps, for a reason!

    I did take a few looks at model soundings prior to event but I didn’t pick out that snow growth would be so godawful. I had under 10:1 with zero mix.  This has bagged us before in synoptic storms and is usually a good reason to just stick with 10:1. Back in January 2005 we had a similar event (was a coastal low though) but similar temps during storm. Ended up around 12” but flake size was similarly small.

    • Like 1
  5. 5 minutes ago, CNY_WX said:

    That’s why I didn’t want to be a Debbie Downer last night but I’ve been through enough of these to sense when thing aren’t panning out the way we hoped. Actually your LE is pretty close to what the models were spitting out but a 8.7:1 ratio is what you would expect in a I95 storm not CNY at sub 10 degrees. 

    Yeah it was evident last night. Once the best forcing seemed to head NE towards ENY and with the snow hole in west central NY, the writing was on the wall. There was no CSI banding anywhere in sight and frankly not sure why it should have been expected with a weak slp and basically an overrunning WAA situation.

  6. 8 minutes ago, CNY_WX said:

    I only measured 3.4 inches here between 12:30 AM and 7 AM giving me 9.2 for the storm so far. I honestly hope I can squeeze out at least another 3 inches to get me to a foot. I’m about to enter a break in the snow but the radar is still looking pretty good to the south around Ithaca. I’ll have a LE measurement as soon as the snow melts in the tube. 

    Similar #s here. Officially calling this a bust.  Locally anyway. Ratios! Kuchera #epicfail

  7. 13 minutes ago, CNY_WX said:

    Did you see the lake effect band off Lake Michigan?  It extends almost the entire length of the lake and comes ashore over Chicago. 

    That’s pretty cool. I was there in the northern suburbs of Chicago over Thanksgiving for my sons graduation from Navy boot camp in Waukegan.  Poor guys there now dealing with snow also. :(

  8. There is a huge dryslot of sorts, not a real dryslot associated with slp, west of I-81 out towards western NY east of the Buffalo region. My best guess is it is downsloping related, off the Allegany Mt region in NW PA. This seems to be broad enough to be impinging all the way to I-81.  This will have a big impact on snowfall for the Genesee region to finger lakes.

    its always something with these storms. You can get f*cked six different ways to Sunday (literally in this case) and never see half of them coming.  Unbelievable.

    KROC will still do ok with lake enhancement with NE and then N winds but my location looks to be condemned to the lower end of predicted ranges (1 in 10 probability snowfall around 10”).  Sigh.

     

  9. 43 minutes ago, TugHillMatt said:

    So...we go from negative digits Monday to a rainstorm on Wednesday. This continues this winter's theme of snow getting water logged and nasty right after it has fallen.

    I know it is a few days away...but right now models are in general agreement of rain all along the eastern seaboard.

    Stupid.

    KBGM notes that models haven’t yet picked up on widespread snowpack so they are expecting a more frozen outcome but I do think we flip to rain for at least part of the next system. Probably not a lot, but enough to make snowshoeing and x-country skiing conditions crappy.

    • Thanks 1
  10. Just did midnight measurement...5.0”, 0.60” liquid equivalent, storm total.

    11am to 6pm: 2.0” and 0.17” melted. 11.8:1 ratio

    6pm to Midnight:  3.0 and 0.43” melted. 6.9:1 ratio

    Storm total:  5.0”, 0.60” melted. 8.3:1 ratio. 

    Ratio seems low but I did a second snowfall measurement in front of house in driveway, pretty open and not drifted and also had 5.0”. So I am reasonably confident of the snowfall measurement. Ratio seems low but pretty sure I didn’t screw it up.

×
×
  • Create New...