Over 20" is top 3 of my lifetime, very possible.. I always fall between 15-20" in these (3 : 20" storms and several 15-18") Only 96 and 2013 were more 30" and 40" respectively both guesstimates based on nearby reports..
Im more guidance delays the occlusion and rapid deepening and shunts the goods further NE like 6z NAM , it's going to be full nudity for the CT weenies
Nam is not less amped just doesn’t get precip as far north as.. low is a tic north .. 25-50” around southern ct through nyc metro to central jersey wild run .. another jack NE too 20-30”
That was us in Juno 6-8" fell .. Forecast was 24-36" .. nws map had the 36-39" bullseye over my house still have the images on my phone for inspiration/rage when I need it.
What your recollection of 1978 compared to this? There are surface maps floating around comparing this to the surface map of 78 with a 1049 high in the same exact spot in Canada and a stronger storm this go around in the same spot.
Ya we have to just take this all in and enjoy - epic stuff being modeled.. We have to realize a low pressure around 970 mb will most likely go just inside the benchmark in the next 36-48 hours, wild things are going to happen..
For example Upton's Blizzard Warning is for 11-15" but there map has us at 15-16" lol makes no damn sense, then it makes people like us look bad when the public gets the alert for only 11-15"