wxsniss

To state the obvious, important to note... that's additional accumulation beginning after 7pm Many areas of CT already exceeded that map

You should do great. Snowgrowth and rates look fantastic next 5-6 hours. We started sticking in Coolidge Corner around 3:45pm

Same... remember how quickly Dec 17 stacked up. We would have had 1-2 inches already. Finally whitening the ground and cars here in Brookline after hours of moderate snow. Per HRRR soundings, next 5-6 hours will not disappoint

Keep the obs coming! I saw your temp 33-34F... sticking ok? HRRR soundings have Boston metro rocking 5-10pm, ground and cars finally starting to whiten

Boston metro wide swath of 33/34F... we'd probably have close to an inch accumulated on the ground already if it wasn't so warm Much better snowgrowth and rates now as we enter our first meaty band, let's see what we can do.

Agree, HRRR soundings for Boston metro were always garbage before 4-5pm... then look excellent through at least 10pm I expect snowgrowth and rates to improve significantly within the next 90 minutes

34F on this side of the CF... gotta hope rates will be enough to wet bulb. So far barely even accumulating on cars. Expectation was always 4-5pm and later in Boston metro for better snowgrowth and rates

CF looks to be right here at Brookline, 34F moderate rates but trouble sticking so far I think we'll have no problem sticking once the heavy rates enter after 4pm

Doing the exact same, Tip. Watching Philly obs like a hawk. This zero-sum dynamic is reflected in guidance too. The less gets dumped there, the more mechanics are preserved northeast.

Let's hope the forcing can maintain... those bands in LI sound remind me of 12/17 I called for 8-12" BOS city proper, 10-14" in northwest burbs, not including anything Tuesday evening... if the forcing we see down south maintains (and does not attenuate as on some guidance), and the CF sets up southeast of the city, I'll bust too low. I know it's not directly related to our forum, but really high stakes in Philly area... models still in 2 very different camps down there, and it seems the less is unloaded down there, the better the mechanics up here.

That’s no moon...

Thanks for this Tip. See discussion ~ 2am last night... we were raising the similar points, without the same expert understanding. I wish I could remember the blizzard from ?2013 when guidance had a similar struggle for similar reasons... no single dominant shortwave within a great trough setup, and therefore a discombobulated solution on guidance... I remember only that I referred to the multiple spawned SLPs as mogwais popping up (reference to the movie Gremlins), but guidance eventually coalesced around a dominant shortwave with a blizzard. I also remember a quick leadtime of guidance "transitioning" towards that eventual outcome. Before I get jumped on, I'm not at all saying that a blizzard will verify tomorrow... just pointing out the evolution similarities in what we are seeing. I do also think that guidance may not "see" the possibility in relatively shorter lead time because of so much in flux today. Fun times! 10 days ago seems like a different season.

Agree... when it's CMC / RGEM / HRPDS leading the way, you gotta remain skeptical. But I do think it's reasonable to expect that none of this will be sorted out on guidance until later Monday, even if the lead time is < 36 hours. Too much in flux with Monday's system underway. Also as someone suggested earlier, this could be just a transition on guidance towards a more continuous event.

Yeah it's a really complex evolution... between a baroclinic zone that shifts further southeast courtesy of Monday's system, and leftover chunks of vorticity rotating around the broad trough... the end result is these cascading SLPs.... you get the sense a much bigger potential that Tip described is there, but it's just too discombobulated to materialize.

Spawns a new low, but it's too far offshore... impacts northeastern ME

All this energy spawning disparate lows reminds me of a storm a few years ago... sorry I can't remember the date... On guidance a large trough with multiple pieces of vorticity spawning different SLPs as they hit the coast, and we compared it to mogwais... guidance struggled and eventually coalesced into a single dominant SLP... reality was a SNE blizzard RGEM did the same thing as CMC and HRPDS, and Euro hints at it too... glad to see a potential popping up before it's off Maine

0z RGEM really goes to town with that leftover vorticity Wed Euro hints at it too

But still delivers to eastern SNE... in fact a tick colder in interior southeast MA

0z NAM... not what I wanted to see. Sizeable jump southwest thru 21 hrs. Will have the Philly forum cheering.

Exactly what I was thinking 8-12" city proper, 10-14" you / metrowest If 0z NAM holds, I think that's a great forecast. I'm tossing RGEM/old-GFS/UK.

Agree, Dec event was much better organized... this one is more disjointed, with mid and upper level centers maybe further southwest than ideal, but apparently plenty of WAA lift + 850 fetch to deliver. What are you thinking for Chestnut Hill? The other puzzle is what happens Tuesday. Guidance all over the place with that.

...and other times deliver over-performers like Dec 17. Box seems to have favored the NAM/HREF dynamics for Monday afternoon. I think 8-12" Boston city proper, 10-14" suburbs / metro west is very realistic. Verbatim off NAM, this will be a wild afternoon commute... would be 1-2" / rates for hours:

Yeah there's a ridiculous spread in guidance for Tuesday... Just compare RGEM vs. NAM for 18z Tues

Yep tick east, cooler but less prolific with qpf --- really key point is it did not make a last minute jump towards RGEM/old-GFS:

Box AFD: Heavy snow... As mentioned above very cold/dry airmass over the region this evening will set the stage for an impressive front end thump of heavy snow Monday afternoon and evening. Very strong easterly jet at 850 mb of 5 standard deviations will provide an Atlantic fire hose of moisture to overrun the cold/dry airmass currently over the region. This strong forcing for ascent will be enhanced by mid level instability Monday afternoon and evening as dry slot approaches. This entrainment of mid level dry air will steepen mid level lapse rates and result in 1-2" hourly snowfall rates Mon afternoon and evening. HREF supports this with high probs of 1-2" hourly rates. Even the HREF hourly mean is 1.5-2.0 inches. That combined with instability aloft, would not be surprised if 3+ inch hourly rates for a time in the strongest snow bands, along with a low risk of TSSN! Nevertheless, travel will be extremely difficult Monday afternoon and evening given these hourly snowfall rates. Given the evaporative cooling potential initially, followed the colder guidance here. Although given low level temps are marginal across Eastern CT/RI/MA, followed the lower SLR from the NBM which are less than 10-1. Although this may be offset early on as snow growth is very favorable 18z-00z. Thus heavy wet snow across this region will increase the risk for snow loading issues/tree damage and power outages.