dendrite

Of course that's with 2 CHH obs per day. There's probably been some instances where the PWATs max out in between RAOB times and we "miss" it. There's probably a good chance that those record PWATs actually had higher values at some point during the day too. But yeah, impressive nonetheless.

By now, probably.

Date: 3 day GFS valid 0Z SAT 22 DEC 18 Station: KCHH Latitude: 41.67 Longitude: -69.97 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEV PRES HGHT TEMP DEWP RH DD WETB DIR SPD THETA THE-V THE-W THE-E W mb m C C % C C deg knt K K K K g/kg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 1000 -24 SFC 997 4 12.9 12.6 98 0.3 12.7 137 27 286.3 288.0 286.0 312.0 9.23 2 950 412 16.3 16.2 99 0.1 16.3 154 57 293.8 296.0 291.4 328.9 12.31 3 900 873 15.2 14.5 96 0.6 14.8 167 60 297.1 299.2 291.9 330.8 11.64 4 850 1356 12.3 10.7 90 1.6 11.3 174 57 299.1 300.8 290.9 327.1 9.57 5 800 1862 9.4 8.6 95 0.8 8.9 179 60 301.1 302.7 290.9 327.1 8.77 6 750 2397 7.0 6.6 97 0.4 6.8 183 61 304.2 305.7 291.4 328.8 8.19 7 700 2963 4.2 3.6 96 0.6 3.9 186 60 307.2 308.5 291.4 328.9 7.11 8 650 3563 1.1 0.8 98 0.3 0.9 186 59 310.2 311.4 291.6 329.5 6.23 9 600 4204 -2.0 -2.1 99 0.1 -2.1 183 58 313.8 314.8 292.0 331.0 5.45 10 550 4892 -5.8 -5.9 99 0.1 -5.8 181 61 317.2 318.1 292.2 331.6 4.48 11 500 5634 -9.9 -10.1 99 0.2 -10.0 182 68 321.0 321.7 292.4 332.7 3.56 12 450 6441 -14.3 -14.6 98 0.3 -14.4 185 75 325.3 325.8 292.9 334.6 2.75 13 400 7325 -19.7 -21.6 85 1.9 -20.2 187 79 329.4 329.8 293.2 335.4 1.70 14 350 8302 -27.1 -29.3 82 2.2 -27.5 185 77 332.2 332.4 293.3 335.8 0.97 15 300 9392 -36.5 -37.3 92 0.8 -36.5 184 77 334.0 334.1 293.3 335.9 0.52 16 250 10624 -48.3 -48.6 97 0.3 -48.3 187 79 334.3 334.3 293.0 335.0 0.19 17 200 12061 -55.9 -60.3 57 4.5 -56.0 202 84 344.3 344.3 295.4 344.5 0.06 18 150 13877 -60.6 -81.1 5 20.5 -60.8 201 64 365.6 365.6 299.8 365.7 0.00 19 100 16357 -65.9 -83.0 8 17.1 -66.0 211 26 400.4 400.4 305.3 400.4 0.00 TRP 0 WND 0 Sounding variables and indices 1000-500 mb thick: 5657.90 m Freezing level: 632.37 mb = 3789.37 m = 12432.15 ft Wetbulb zero: 634.96 mb = 3750.71 m = 12305.34 ft Precipitable water: 1.73 inches Sfc-500 mean rel hum: 96.92 % Est. max temperature: 25.77 C = 78.39 F Sfc-Lift cond lev (LCL): 992.16 mb = 42.87 m = 140.64 ft T: 13.24 C 700-500 lapse rate: 5.30 C/km

I think he toggles his posting "source" to HTML and just pastes the code in.

lol C NH...where S winds go to die

I wish that warm front would just blast through here. I really don’t need any extra low level forcing over the CAD cold dome. 18z GFS has low/mid 60s for much of SNE.

idk but I shot him

Not really. +SN is fairly easy of the 1/4SM variety. 0SM vis you won't see at an automated station though and M1/4SM is really rare.

I think Nottingham had the 40", but it may have been a bit inflated. Lots of 30"+ readings near the interior/coastal Rockingham CWA border though. Coastal front?

Just looking at the “bright” side.

At least we’ve already gained 2 minutes of daylight in the evening.

labs has a paywall for me now. Even Joerg is putting maps under his own paywall. I wonder how Maue feels about that.

Not free anymore

22.3"

James...pick a username and stick with it.

lol watch the SSW be too strong and screw us in some way. Kinda like how the -NAO bent so much in 09-10 that we broke.

And that will be a very dense 1" of liquid.

700mb RH will save us

We wind.

idk...I’ve read the GEFS school the ecmwf suite.

I think this is the report I recall reading. Guess I need to put up a tall dual fence around my rain gauge now for maximum accuracy. Maybe put it inside the run? https://www.weather.gov/media/asos/ASOS Implementation/AWPAG Altershield Final Report 08-09 v2.doc

Did he have to go to school in 2ft of snow uphill both ways?

I thought the AWPAGs were a lot better? Especially with the dual wind screens?

Longer period of record?