Jump to content

dendrite

Administrator / Meteorologist
  • Posts

    71,364
  • Joined

Everything posted by dendrite

  1. Last 4 runs of the goofus. More downstream ridging and curling in of that vortmax
  2. Maybe…not sure how much effect it would have on the orientation of the vortmax at that scale, but I guess the more data to initialize in the better.
  3. GFS is a lot more amped and NW. AI is a bit too.
  4. heh…yeah maybe. I still think they tend to broadbrush too much, but maybe it’s a signal if they’re significantly NW with QPF. We need one of those events with a sharp N cutoff to see if they can pin down tight gradients.
  5. Some of these runs look a hair flatter, but they’re finding a way to get more precip NW.
  6. We’re going to be in trouble when NCEP drops all of the models for just the rrfs.
  7. It’s doing some weird troughy things wherever the incremental QPF maxes are.
  8. Looks like the goofus will come in a little more amped
  9. You can see how the 12km really curls the tail of the vortmax in at 48hr versus what the icon and rgem do.
  10. Yeah NNE has been fooled by a zonked 12k run late in the game many a time. Looks like the rgem is a tick east.
  11. I mean it’s not like you’d be missing much from either event.
  12. I think there’s too much spacing to really have much effect.
  13. Yeah that late little amplification of the vortmax gives E MA a little boost before it slides east.
  14. It’s curling the southern end of the vortmin pretty good as it approaches SNE. We’ll have to see if that suite trends that way.
  15. NAM was the flattest at H5…looks more in line now to me
  16. They’re learning that it’s fun to troll weather weenies
  17. I’d rather compare the upper levels rather than QPF. It seems like they throw QPF further back than you would expect from the shortwave, but sometimes as you get close the shortwaves trend more amplified. So are the AIs sometimes right for the wrong reasons?
×
×
  • Create New...