The 5min archived obs have the higher precision with the T groups...so idk. I have to find the data from the server MW is getting them from and see the raw output.
ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/asos-fivemin/6401-2019/64010KBDL201906.dat
I'll have to dig more. ISU must have them. I just figured MW would have the full precision if it was available. It's be nice if we could get them...I mean it's 2019...not 1999. We're not on dialup with that big of bandwidth concerns anymore.
lol...BDL is legit 100F. The 6hr max has 100F and 38C is either 100 or 101 (37.8C or 38.3C). So there's no guessing game on whether or not they hit 100F when 38C/100.4F rolls in.
Anyway...the 18z 6hr max and mins are in for 18z.
BAF shows a high of 98.6F (37C) on Mesowest. That technically rounds to 99F, but like I said, it could be 98F or 99F. The 6hr max shows "10367" which is +36.7C...so that's a high of 98F so far.
It's all from NOAA's servers. It's kinda weird because our ASOS stations will report obs in whole degrees F. But we stepped away from the surface aviation obs in 1996 to go with the international METAR coding. So those whole F temps get converted to C. They had to add a T group for temp and dew in the remarks section in order to report temp and dew in tenths celcius (so that we can convert back those readings in whole degrees F). It's a lot of bouncing back and forth. Utah/Mesowest is just converting what they get from NOAA. So the METARs and SPECI (special) obs have the T grouping in tenths, but the relatively new supplementary obs do not have the T group and it just comes in as whole degrees C in the body of the ob.
I guess pilots don't care if it's 96F or 97F. 36C is good enough for them.
The 5 min obs (non METAR or SPECIs) come in via whole degrees celcius. That's what Mesowest gets in. So for BOS that's 36C. For BDL and BAF that was 37C. 36C converted to F is 96.8F. But that just means it is either 96F (35.6C) or 97F (36.1C). It's just a communications limitation from NOAA. I wish they'd just send every 5 min ob in tenths celcius and not whole celcius. Then you'd get the accurate reading in whole degrees F.
ot but why? They pulled this 6 day stretch last year for record high mins.
7/12
74 in 2002
67 in 2018
66 in 2014+
7/13
70 in 2018
70 in 2014
68 in 2012
7/14
69 in 2018
69 in 2005
68 in 2014
7/15
72 in 2018
71 in 2014
71 in 2005
7/16
69 in 2018
69 in 2010
68 in 2017+
7/17
69 in 2014
69 in 2005
68 in 2018
BDL 98
BED 98
OWD 98
BOS 97
TAN 97
MHT 97
FIT 97
I mean most MOS guidance had 97-100F. How is that a bust? I'm going to assume NWS zone forecasts were calling for upper 90s in the lower els? The decoupling example is usually when the forecast is -10F and calm and it ends up +5F with a 10mph wind.
Dews overperformed progs...I was a little worried about that late last week. But like we said, shave a couple degrees off the highs and lop them onto the dews and in the end it's the same heat indices.