Jump to content

Baroclinic Zone

Members
  • Posts

    46,530
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Baroclinic Zone

  1. Are HRRR/RAP run on their own model physics or do they use either the NAM/GFS as part of it?
  2. Pulling for ya. Less than 10" here thus far.
  3. @Damage In Tolland pray the 12z NAM is correct.
  4. I had 2005 as well. Had over 100" that winter.
  5. Gonna need some uber ratios to achieve the widespread 4-6"
  6. Tolland I'm expecting 1-2" here. I'm going up upstream radar and short-term models. It just doesn't look to be coming together as robust as yesterday was showing.
  7. Can clearly see the banding N and S when looking at Albany and Upton radar,
  8. Best is still Pike N imo. Feel that's where the banding will be and S of that there will be a subsidence zone.
  9. Call me skeptical on this one. I'm gonna on lower end of totals here. 1-2"
  10. May be in a bit of a screwgie zone here.
  11. NAM cooled off as well. Has been the warmest model thus far.
  12. Reggie not backing away from colder solution.
  13. You're not telling me anything I don't already know/see. By "OTS", we mean what we saw on modeling a mere 24hrs ago where models were spitting out 6"+.
  14. This just feels like a system that's going to follow the natural baroclinic zone along the coastline. It's not a strong storm and forcing is relatively weak. This would bring the mixing right along the coastline, cape/islands and slightly inland. This brings the best banding right along the Pike region north and south.
  15. Isn't VD Feb 14th? Thurs 11th Fri 12th Lt snow Coastal Snowstorm VD?
×
×
  • Create New...