Jump to content

Baroclinic Zone

Members
  • Posts

    46,024
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Baroclinic Zone

  1. A discussion for another time and I'm not diminishing from what your feeling is, it's been a good one for you for sure.
  2. Are HRRR/RAP run on their own model physics or do they use either the NAM/GFS as part of it?
  3. Pulling for ya. Less than 10" here thus far.
  4. @Damage In Tolland pray the 12z NAM is correct.
  5. I had 2005 as well. Had over 100" that winter.
  6. Gonna need some uber ratios to achieve the widespread 4-6"
  7. Tolland I'm expecting 1-2" here. I'm going up upstream radar and short-term models. It just doesn't look to be coming together as robust as yesterday was showing.
  8. Can clearly see the banding N and S when looking at Albany and Upton radar,
  9. Best is still Pike N imo. Feel that's where the banding will be and S of that there will be a subsidence zone.
  10. Call me skeptical on this one. I'm gonna on lower end of totals here. 1-2"
  11. May be in a bit of a screwgie zone here.
  12. NAM cooled off as well. Has been the warmest model thus far.
×
×
  • Create New...