Jump to content

winter_warlock

Members
  • Posts

    2,728
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by winter_warlock

  1. Well that a lil better !! I'll have to get the real potent coffee in the morning !!
  2. Oh crap. After seeing the GFS.. now I gotta wait up for the euro lol.. looks like I'll be groggy at work tomorrow!!! Ahh the pains of being a weather nut!!!
  3. I like that!! No chance of any mixing or the dreaded rain/snow line!!
  4. GFS kinda trending to what it showed for that day about 5 days ago if I remember correctly!
  5. Not bad at all. !! Still some time for a farther tick west. But was a pretty good run!
  6. Still a nice improvement. Plenty of time for tweaks!
  7. Yup the more conservative we are the less we get disappointed!! If that makes any sense
  8. Definitely a more positive tilt compared to GFS.. in my opinion
  9. FWIW....DT from Wxrisk posted this WXRISK VIEW: There is the potential for a wave of LOW pressure to develop on the front but the question is how close to the coast. Most of the models for the past few days have been keeping this weak LOW well off the coast but the Trend started early WED with the GFS and the European AI models. DISCUSSION/ MAPS Last week in the newsletter I mentioned three specific winter storm threats between the period from January 15–30. AS i stated on SUNDAY the first threat of January 15- 16 is gone. A stronger arctic cold front will sweep through the Midwest and reach the East Coast on Saturday January 17. This cold front appears to be much stronger and looks like it will bring snow showers to much of the Middle Atlantic region even into the Piedmont as far east is I — — 95 from NYC to Richmond. It would not surprise me to see an 1–2 inches of snow in the Shenandoah Valley., the mountains of PA, western MD, WV, southwest VA, and the mountains west in NC.
  10. Oh ok I had no idea that the opinion was debunked. Maybe it's just the fact we had more storms back then us throwing me off . But either way thanks for the correction!
  11. well ur right about that Randy!!! Especially the nam at 84 hours is total crap !!
  12. People probably won't agree, but to me is seemed like models were more accurate about 15 years ago compared to now. But that's just me
  13. My bad I meant it looks like the ridge is farther west on the Nam. But. My eyes are bad without my contacts
  14. Looks like a higher ridge in the west in the nam.. unless my eyes are screwed up again
×
×
  • Create New...