I do not suffer ignorance. There are plenty of subjects I don't know anything about. But I don't just make up crazy BS and pass it off as legit. Or worse think that crazy nonsense should carry any weight or is somehow above reproach.
ETA: I teach constitutional law so its hard not to get into that...my refute wasn't that the constitution is optional...its that the constitution is vague enough in most areas such that its never that simple. During two different periods in our history we locked people up for criticizing the President and courts did not think that violated the 1st Amendment. We totally ignored the 14th Amendment for almost 100 years. Somehow eminent domain didn't protect native tribes. Due Process didn't apply to Japanese Americans in WWII. The 2nd Amendment wasn't an individual right for 200 years and then the courts decided it was. The Constitution has been interpreted, re-interpreted, and manipulated so many times that using it as a concrete end all to any issue is kind of disingenuous IMO. But everyone is entitled to their opinion of how those rights SHOULD be interpreted. And we can have an amicable debate about that...unless you start spouting nonsense like saying the illuminati wrote the Bill of Rights as a way to fool American's into thinking we have freedom so they can subjugate us (not kidding had that come up recently). There is a limit to what I tolerate.