-
Posts
26,289 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Forums
American Weather
Media Demo
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by psuhoffman
-
January Storm Term Threat Discussions (Day 3 - Day 7)
psuhoffman replied to WxUSAF's topic in Mid Atlantic
Excellent -
To be clear ideally I didn’t want either the GM or coach gone. But the relationship was such one had to go and so I would have kept the coach.
-
Feb Long Range Discussion (Day 3 and beyond) - MERGED
psuhoffman replied to WinterWxLuvr's topic in Mid Atlantic
Just FYI eps likes both the 26th and 28th waves. Threat 1 Threat 2: this is still the best shot at a BIG storm Imo that ridge out west is close...slightly east but with that whole NW to SE alignment across North America due to the block something should be able to amplify in less room then typical wavelengths imo. Can see the energy coming east (x) and imo that’s primed for an amplifying system along the east coast at about our latitude. If anything this looks even better then when I first showed this period a few days ago. -
Feb Long Range Discussion (Day 3 and beyond) - MERGED
psuhoffman replied to WinterWxLuvr's topic in Mid Atlantic
-
Feb Long Range Discussion (Day 3 and beyond) - MERGED
psuhoffman replied to WinterWxLuvr's topic in Mid Atlantic
Yea I’ve noticed somewhere around 150 hours (sometimes a little longer sometimes a little less) the globals have been latching onto the major synoptic setups. Adjustments after that are less wild and more fine tuning details. We need this to hold inside that window. -
Feb Long Range Discussion (Day 3 and beyond) - MERGED
psuhoffman replied to WinterWxLuvr's topic in Mid Atlantic
Yea hence the “not over react”. I felt like people wanted me to say “it’s over we’re screwed” because of a couple bad runs yesterday. -
Feb Long Range Discussion (Day 3 and beyond) - MERGED
psuhoffman replied to WinterWxLuvr's topic in Mid Atlantic
What triggered you lately? -
Feb Long Range Discussion (Day 3 and beyond) - MERGED
psuhoffman replied to WinterWxLuvr's topic in Mid Atlantic
@CAPE gefs is either about to score its biggest coup ever or it’s off on one of its old school not a clue tangents. This is no time for America to start to get its act together. -
Feb Long Range Discussion (Day 3 and beyond) - MERGED
psuhoffman replied to WinterWxLuvr's topic in Mid Atlantic
Euro control was noice -
Feb Long Range Discussion (Day 3 and beyond) - MERGED
psuhoffman replied to WinterWxLuvr's topic in Mid Atlantic
Not snowing has always been the most likely way we fail. We have gotten quite skilled at that. -
Feb Long Range Discussion (Day 3 and beyond) - MERGED
psuhoffman replied to WinterWxLuvr's topic in Mid Atlantic
Snow -
Feb Long Range Discussion (Day 3 and beyond) - MERGED
psuhoffman replied to WinterWxLuvr's topic in Mid Atlantic
Wrt pac crud...if the blocking holds once the MJO moves out of 6 (assuming we don’t get some fooking 3 week standing wave there like last year) that trough in the pac NW should start to press east some under the block. It’s not a cold pattern but in February that’s not a shutout look. We would get a trough along the east coast and some handoff of energy between the two. Of course lately everything’s a shutout pattern so who knows. -
Feb Long Range Discussion (Day 3 and beyond) - MERGED
psuhoffman replied to WinterWxLuvr's topic in Mid Atlantic
Euro control is a DC flush hit -
Feb Long Range Discussion (Day 3 and beyond) - MERGED
psuhoffman replied to WinterWxLuvr's topic in Mid Atlantic
I really do think as the ridge retrogrades and the trough backs into the east coast around the 28-30 somethings going to make it through the shred factory and amplify to the east coast. That still doesn’t mean we get a flush hit. But that’s been the best chance in this whole progression for a while and still looks like it. -
Feb Long Range Discussion (Day 3 and beyond) - MERGED
psuhoffman replied to WinterWxLuvr's topic in Mid Atlantic
On this run...but just from a longwave pattern POV that’s the most likely time period to get a more amped storm to the east coast. I have no idea what the details will be. Probably some convoluted progression that screws us bad. -
Feb Long Range Discussion (Day 3 and beyond) - MERGED
psuhoffman replied to WinterWxLuvr's topic in Mid Atlantic
This..we need that suppression bit that wave was weak sauce at the upper levels. We need a better handoff and more energy to eject across with one of those waves. The 3rd one does that but runs slightly north of where we want. Overall this run was good. That pattern was what I was looking for and would give us multiple chances next week. -
Feb Long Range Discussion (Day 3 and beyond) - MERGED
psuhoffman replied to WinterWxLuvr's topic in Mid Atlantic
The wave on the 28/29 is the one with the best upper support but it’s coming across a bit too far north. -
Feb Long Range Discussion (Day 3 and beyond) - MERGED
psuhoffman replied to WinterWxLuvr's topic in Mid Atlantic
No that run was beautiful. We want that boundary a little south of us at 200 hours. This isn’t a run that has it squashed to southern VA and NC. That would be bad. But we know it won’t be totally accurate at 200 hours. And we know the adjustment is still usually north 60% of the time. So all jokes aside just playing the odds we want it right there at that range. I’m totally fine with it..... But we all know no matter what the 40% screw us option is what will happen every time so why bother...there @Ji took care of it for you. -
Feb Long Range Discussion (Day 3 and beyond) - MERGED
psuhoffman replied to WinterWxLuvr's topic in Mid Atlantic
Yes that’s always been the most likely time period based on pattern progression. As everything retrogrades that’s the point where something is most likely to amplify in the east yet have a boundary far enough south to keep us on the frozen side. Doesn’t mean we don’t get something before or after...the pattern isn’t crap on either side of that but that’s when it all seems right wrt the longwave features to see an amplified wave along the east coast south of us. That’s all I saw. The details have to fill in as we get closer. -
Feb Long Range Discussion (Day 3 and beyond) - MERGED
psuhoffman replied to WinterWxLuvr's topic in Mid Atlantic
Lol I typed that up and then looked as the next panels loaded... details aside the whole euro progression is closer to my “vision” a week ago. Much less ridging and more of a mid latitude handoff between the western and eastern trough under the block v blasting a ridge between the two. -
Feb Long Range Discussion (Day 3 and beyond) - MERGED
psuhoffman replied to WinterWxLuvr's topic in Mid Atlantic
It doesn’t have enough separation between waves to really amp. But the good news is without much separation to allow the cold to press south behind the NS wave we need less amped. If we can get some separation between the multiple waves next week after the lead NS wave clears that would be our chance at a bigger event. -
Feb Long Range Discussion (Day 3 and beyond) - MERGED
psuhoffman replied to WinterWxLuvr's topic in Mid Atlantic
Geps fwiw supports a further south solution for both threats next week like the cmc op. -
Feb Long Range Discussion (Day 3 and beyond) - MERGED
psuhoffman replied to WinterWxLuvr's topic in Mid Atlantic
Gefs not on board with the 2 wave idea. Favors one dominant wave to our north. Then it favors a miller b screw job solution for the next threat. -
Feb Long Range Discussion (Day 3 and beyond) - MERGED
psuhoffman replied to WinterWxLuvr's topic in Mid Atlantic
That’s a kick in the nads after the improvements on the ops -
Feb Long Range Discussion (Day 3 and beyond) - MERGED
psuhoffman replied to WinterWxLuvr's topic in Mid Atlantic
Lol it’s good overall. We knew the euro all alone was not going to be exactly right. This progression gives us a way way better chance then the fully phased idea the gfs was tossing around before. But it’s never easy. This solution is also better for the follow up wave.