psuhoffman

Three waves each with successively more upside. I have been keying on the 28-30th as the time period that made most sense as everything retrogrades and the ridge should pull west enough to get east coast amplification and cold (whatever there is) to time to. But the eps are split between the wave around the 28/29 and one around the 30/31. The 30/31 might have the best chance to turn the corner amplify up the coast. The h5 look through that 5 day period is classic. @Ji We cannot waste this. This isn’t a pattern we’re going to get that often. I honestly dunno what it will take if this doesn’t work!

@Ji seats are gonna fill up fast that captures two waves technically because the eps members can’t decide between the 28/29 or the 30/31 wrt which wave will be the one to amplify.

We got plenty of airheads though

You getting on my bus?

Based on the pattern it argues suppression. But I’m starting to wonder if the pathetic thermals just can’t resist any southerly flow which is unavoidable ahead of a wave.

That’s always been “the one” imo but that doesn’t mean I didn’t want a double feature lol. Still time. We need less ridging in front. Just wish we had true cold and didn’t need so much to go perfect.

The setup argues south, the lack of cold has me doubting.

Do we do the lowered expectations thing and say “at least it’s not the CMC” or do we compare it to the last several runs?

If you ignored the gfs the cmc and euro were pretty consistent for several runs until today

North of the CMC??? I honestly thought that cmc run was eye opening bad in how far north it was. Kinda hoped that would be an extreme outlier.

How bad was the UK? Hopefully not as far north as the CMC!

Better

@leesburg 04 My points are frustration at the larger picture and how much harder it's getting to get snow...not specific to this week. We may luck out still...its a really nice setup still...just need some south adjustment to the current consensus but I am also still seeing signs the coverage of snow will be much less then it should be historically given this setup. An amplifying southern wave sliding west to east under a block with an airmass that originated in the Arctic over the top...that should have a HUGE expansive WAA snow shield to its north and northeast and we shouldn't need to be sweating getting the exact perfect track to get some snow. It was already hard to get snow here...if every storm even in a really good pattern has some paltry narrow freaking area of snow it makes it even more likely we strike out even in good patterns, and you can forget it in mediocre or bad ones.

No towel tossing. Long way to go. But this is what’s maddeningly frustrating and is making this so much harder then it should be to get snow from this pattern. Look at the 12z cmc and 6z para gfs as the system moves across. Where is the snow? It’s January 25 with a polar in origin airmass and a block over the top of this wave and the only place getting snow is under the upper level dynamics NW of the low. Where is the typical WAA snow shield to the N and NE???? This looks like what you expect a storm in late March to look like not Jan 25 with a block and northerly flow on top.

No we needed that NS wave to not exist at all...even on the weaker solutions it presses the high pressure out and damages the thermal profile in front of the southern wave some... This time of year I thought we could survive it...we are getting really picky here...but I guess we need like totally every little thing 100% perfect to snow anymore and that little bit of NS wave out ahead damages the temps in front and allows the southern wave to cut.

This lack of deep cold is becoming more then just frustrating. And there is no legit excuse (other then the elephant we don't want to bring up) this time. Yea the southern wave amplified some here but we want an amplified wave or else its squash city and no one gets a big snowstorm. But the problem is there just isnt a deep enough cold airmass to resist the southernly flow ahead of any amplified wave. This west to east setup relies on there being cold in front of waves. But there is no problem with the longwave pattern. There is even a TPV lobe coming across RIGHT ON TOP of the system on the CMC suppressing the flow some and its still not enough...because there isn't enough cold to resist even a fairly mild southerly flow. Its not like this is some phased 970 bomb cutting up the ohio valley. There is no excuse for this warm a solution other then the obvious one. Almost everything is going right from a pattern POV and its still not cold enough. I dont know what to say.

did you follow any of the last several pages?

Significant snow is northern PA...its not even close. NW of 95 gets a little ice if that's your thing...but the significant snows aren't even close to us...

UGH rain....

No not at all...still early and I hate to project...sometimes some factor we weren't even considering before pops up and causes a totally different tangent...but the CMC is not biting on the NS/TPV phase idea. If anything the southern wave looks more amplified and would risk going north not south.

unlike your posts

I meant the op and control are usually pretty similar each run. There was no op past 90 hours at 6z so the control was our best hint at what it might have shown. That's all. Not worth as much attention as it got.

We all know who the posters are that skew everything one way and those that skew the other. I tend to frustrate both. That’s a good thing Imo.

6z gefs finally jumped on board for the 28-30th window.