psuhoffman

NAM is blasting the dry slot way further NW then any other guidance. Let’s hope that’s just a NAM mirage. Everything else about this run is better. And it’s slightly better with the dryslot but it’s still ugly and will make it hard to really ramp up the deform once the dry air has blasted that far north.

Let’s see what happens the fgen boundary that’s going to become the deform is much further south this run then 12z at the same time in western PA and WV.

Another clue is that band in WV/OH because it’s being caused by the same fgen boundary that will eventually become the deformation axis as the upper low and dying primary move east. Seeing that not blast up into Ohio and central PA is a good thing.

Through 30 I see minor but definite improvements on the NAM

NAM is slower with the wave so far, that’s good for the eventual secondary capture

I know that’s the fail option and it’s NEVER off the table in a miller b but not sure I’d use the hrrr at that range.

@Bob Chill it will sting some of the capture is late and the ccb misses. But note as this amps up so has the WAA the last few runs. So even without getting crushed by the CCB the DC area is still looking at a 6-10” snowstorm and that’s if they mostly get screwed which is probably about what it would have been if we got a more suppressed weaker solution. So imo 6-10” with the potential to get 20” if we get lucky with the ccb is better then a suppressed weaker wave where we get maybe 6-12 but there is no hecs upside. But I think some let their perception be effected by the “who gets the most” game. They feel better about 8” if they are the Jack v a 10” storm where somewhere else got 30”. I get it. Envy is a real thing lol. But I always will take my chances on a more amped up storm with bigger upside. These kinds of setups don’t come along that often why be conservative. Our snow climo sucks and it mostly boom or bust so let’s go for boom every chance we get imo.

That’s ok let’s put down 10” in a deathband in those 5 hours then WGAF what happens after.

True but so far the trend across all guidance Nams/icon/rgem has been a faster further south coastal capture at 12z. That’s just good.

We’ve been good. Just this once. Come on. Then I won’t ask the snow gods for a god damn thing for at least 2 years. I swear.

Omfg rgem!!!!!

I don’t think the confluence is the problem. That has to be moving out as the storm arrives or it can’t amplify on the coast and we get a weaker sinking wave and no coastal at all. The problem is the angle of that last vort of the pinwheel to our north comes down in a bad spot and as the trough to our west feels the influence it stretches out positively tilted. That wasn’t on guidance 5 days ago when we were getting 30” bomb solutions here. Confluence has reversed and backed off the last few runs but is still slightly MORE then those epic runs. What changed us the trough being positive on approach which then makes the transfer and capture process take a little longer. Longer pushes that process further up the coast since the low will be gaining latitude UNTIL its captured then it stalls and pinwheels. But we need that sooner v later. We simply need a quicker phase unfortunately if we’re being honest the model bias is typically the wrong way with this and if anything the phase tends to happen slower. Not always though. And the trough is trending better (less positive) the last few runs of the euro and the NAM made a significant jump south at 12z. So DC is still in the ccb game. But the interaction between the wave in the Midwest and that last NS SW to rotate around the Atlantic vortex is what hurt us imo.

You ninjad me again

Every storm is unique. Analogs give you goalposts but yesterday for instance the top 4 analogs included 2 storms that dropped less then 3” on the DC metro and 2 storms that dropped over 20” so you gonna forecast 2-25”?

@high risk and @ers-wxman1 can chime in with how much it does/doesn’t mean but the EPS does not support the dryslot on the op. Increased qpf significantly again especially over N VA. Very slight cut back from WAA but significantly increased the CCB from 18z and we thought that was a great run. Totals dropped SLIGHTLY along the southern zones due to the loss of some with the WAA and deform won’t help south of EZF but increased everywhere else.

EPS look really good for you. N VA Jack.

Good luck extrapolating where a deform of a coastal that hasn’t formed yet sets up in 72 hours from current observations. Let me know how that works for you.

Except the track looks pretty similar the last 2 runs. 0z was deeper and has a more broad h7 circulation vs a tighter closed h7 low 18z. Maybe that made a difference but the track didn’t seem north to me.

Yea but the ggem op was very wet so they simply supported that.

So it’s still a 6-12” snowstorm across our area so it’s not like it’s a full fail. But yes that’s underperforming that look right there. Even more so if you look at the whole progression, primary jumps from the KY OH border to eastern NC then tucks up east of OC. Perfection. But it’s possible the op simply overdid the dryslot on that run. Maybe it was a hiccup. Precip isn’t the most accurate at this range. If we actually get that surface and h5 progression I’ll bet it’s a better result.

Not necessarily. A better qpf mean could indicate the op dryslot was a bit overdone.

Dude has been trolling non stop for days. How can he take any post seriously when he is a whole clown.

To be fair the 0z euro looked great in every way except the QPF. If you just looked at the h5 and mslp you would think N VA northeast got 12”+ easy. Instead we sat under a dryslot forever.

Yea that is killing places DC south. Even with some marginal gains from part 2 it’s a net loss. Unfortunately the primary is shearing out and weakening so the WAA is dying as it gets to us. Suppression ugh lol