Jump to content

psuhoffman

Members
  • Posts

    26,285
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by psuhoffman

  1. Its 6-10" for us... I think in a nina we have to be ok with that and not worry about "but NYC"
  2. GFS is fine where it is now...its latched onto the correct progression up top and now has a similar storm to the UK/GGEM/Euro and its about getting the location and strength nailed down. And its close enough we aren't out of it for the jack either...
  3. Maybe I don't like the fact we've lost about 20% of what was already a pretty pathetic snow climo... I'm not celebrating the fact we still have the remaining 80%...guess I'm a glass half empty kinda guy on this but I don't celebrate that we still get something we already had...I lament that we lost something we used to have
  4. I never thought we would fail THAT way...but now that guidance is on the same page with that we need to see how they converge on a solution. Right now just SE of us is the consensus and I want that to change in the next 24 hours
  5. If we get a full latitude trough in the east that is actually colder than a high latitude block with a trough under it.
  6. no one has said we "lots the ability" but cold snowy patters are happening less. Less not never. We need a hit, no moral victories here
  7. It's done that a few times now with waves WAY to our NW showing frozen when the euro had NOTHING and it of course was wrong each time. I don't even pay it any attention in those setups anymore unless the euro agrees.
  8. The biggest issue I see is the pattern west of the trough...the ridge axis is a little too far west and we don't have a trough south of AK which is typically what causes storms to amplify into the east. Chuck, I know we lose the block...but with the MJO into 8 and the pac jet extending we should get a chance for an amplification into the east after this.
  9. If you flipped all the heights it would be a HORRIBLE pattern. I know numerically its a +NAO but NOBODY except you categorizes the NAO that way. NOBODY
  10. I mean it does produce a storm, it drops 10" of snow on southeast VA...it just doesn't hit us... but looking at that the difference between a hit for us and VA is pretty small when looking at the H5 pattern a couple days before. You're talking about details pretty minor that determine where the northern edge ends up being on a storm
  11. if it was easy we would get a MECS storm more often and not just a couple times a decade.
  12. if that peice over the Dakotas phases in fully its a go...
  13. If the EPS looks like that tonight then its game on... but right now we are being teased each run with just enough guidance to make us think maybe...but we've yet to have a run where the majority consensus was a hit. It's close...real real close.
  14. yea I agree with this... if we arent seeing a hit on guidance Saturday...we will be within the range where major changes have not been happening...its been kinda amazing how locked in guidance has become once inside 100 hours...people focus on the relatively minor changes like a 30 mile shift here or there because often we are on the edges either of the precip or rain snow line and those shifts matter to our ground truth...but the fact it only changed that much in 5 days often is crazy compared to the past when storms would go from a NC hit to a NYC to Boston hit in that time normally. And before people say..."how can you jump ship now" I'm not but I have to be real, yea I liked this period and still do and its a great pattern...but even in a great pattern we can miss a storm like this by a little bit...its amazing its going to be this close...it all came together almost perfectly...but if we get to Saturday its time to admit if its just not 100% right for our location to get a hit and move on to the next wave. There will be more threats I think in this pattern.
  15. not really...pull up the GFS and compare them...the GFS is way off on its own world wrt the NS H5 look...all stretched out over the top... BUT... I am in the "it wasn't a great trend" camp. Those saying its more amplified are correct, however, its also more east and that outweighs this for our purposes because we are the furthest west of all the east coast regions trying to get a storm here...we have the least amount of time to waste as the wave progresses east before it bombs...it doesn't matter if its more amplified if it starts to bomb and gets captured too late...then its the typical congrats beaches and NYC to Boston we are used to in a nina. But its a minor thing...it can flip back at 0z it wasn't some huge move that had me like OH NO.
  16. it was too far southeast and weak with the storm this weekend, finally caved at 12z and jumped way NW in line with other guidance. We will see...
  17. the flow is too suppressive overall for a quick relatively weak STJ wave to get it done...we need it to slow down and phase with that trailing NS TPV lobe tail. That's the path. It's worked before, Dec 2009 was that kind of progression. This wouldn't have that kind of upside I don't think but talking about storm type. The upside on a faster disconnected unphased wave is pretty low...probably 3-6" max and I'm willing to kick that in hopes of a big dog. It's not like we didn't get any snow this season...lets go big or go home here.
  18. It just changed its timing on the STj wave by 24 hours, more in line with other guidance there, but it’s all over the place with the NS H5 features. Until it gets a grip and stabilizes for a few runs with one solution I’m not going to sweat the gfs much. I’d be way more upset of the other guidance which has been more consistent went that way
  19. Yea Vail owned mountains (epic pass) are a mess. People at Park City over new years weekend were hiking back up the mountain the lift line was so long. They under staff, didn’t use the pass $ to make upgrades the way Ikon mountains have, then started a labor fight with their workers for refusing some modest demands. They’re just a mess. Shame some great resorts being mismanaged. I love Breckenridge and Stowe but won’t ski them again until major changes happen. Then west south of Utah is also having a crappy snow year. Taos in NM has like 70” total right now. This makes the issue worse by limiting terrain they can open. I was thinking of a trip there but not this year. Just going to hit up VT and ME a couple times in March and April. I’m going to post a summary of my Revelstoke trip. Y’all need to get out there. Even non skiers it’s a snowmobile Mecca also but you ski it’s got to be a bucket list thing. I skied all week with no lines at all. Worst wait was 10 mins at the main lift on a powder morning. Most of the time no line at all. Snowed 14” while we were there and they had 250” before we got there.
  20. Looks like a great spring New England ski season imo, for those who care, me. New England has been getting crushed lately and VT resorts are building a deep base now. And signs are for a reasonably chilly March not a sudden thaw. Once to April on sunny days it feels great no matter the pattern just some years they don’t have a ton of snow left to enjoy it. This year looks good for April ski season at Killington, Sugarbush and Sugarloaf. Stowe too but I don’t do Vail owned resorts anymore until they make some major management changes.
  21. Weeklies extend our window until about March 10. It remains somewhat “chilly” after but it has a waves to our NW followed by cold shots look to me once past March 10. But this looks good Mar 1-8
×
×
  • Create New...