That may make sense when you know for certain you've been near/exposed to someone who is positive. But what about instances like airport terminals where you'll never know if you've been exposed, but you get a test anyways and are neg and then go about your life. What I am questioning is in those instances where you test neg, despite being potentially exposed, are you supposed to shack up for 2 weeks? A lot of people were flooding to test centers early last week prior to traveling, presumably doing the right thing by making sure they were neg before going to grammy's house, realizing one can never be 100% certain of the test result. Now the media will chastise all of those travelers for doing what they thought was the right thing when/if cases spike. It's a no win situation