Jump to content

Winterweatherlover

Members
  • Posts

    1,109
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Winterweatherlover

  1. 0.3 will tick cpk toward not breaking the record lol.
  2. If those models are correct someone in a narrow area is going to get a nice surprise but i still think those are overdone. RGEM never came on board for this.
  3. Models seem to have two waves now, one around 3/11 and a second stronger one around 3/13-3/14. A lot to sort out here.
  4. Must be rain at the immediate coast based on the snow map but doesn't really matter this far out. https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?rh=2023030512&fh=144&dpdt=&mc=&r=us_ne&p=sn10_024h-imp&m=ukmet
  5. Not really in my interpretation, this was 0Z, seems like it came west or at least is focusing on a different wave. https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?rh=2023030500&fh=180&dpdt=&mc=&r=conus&p=prateptype-imp&m=gdps
  6. 12z CMC cuts (I don't anticipate this being the outcome but presenting all possible solutions). https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?m=gdps&p=prateptype-imp&rh=2023030512&fh=168&r=conus&dpdt=&mc=
  7. 12Z Canadian has no interest either. I lean non event for now but am tracking it.
  8. Not the euro but a massive trend toward it. https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?m=gfs&p=snku_024h-imp&rh=2023030512&fh=162&r=us_ne&dpdt=&mc=
  9. https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?rh=2023030512&fh=147&dpdt=&mc=&r=us_ne&p=prateptype_cat-imp&m=gfs https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?m=gfs&p=prateptype_cat-imp&rh=2023030512&fh=150&r=us_ne&dpdt=&mc= https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?m=gfs&p=prateptype_cat-imp&rh=2023030512&fh=153&r=us_ne&dpdt=&mc= Here we go
  10. Yep this is either going to weak disorganized and flat or an East coast storm, this is not going to be a raging cutter.
  11. I’m not calling for a hecs but the gfs is probably going to cave this time and last time I said other models would probably cave to gfs. I think we either end up with significant east coast storm or a flat weak wave.
  12. I don’t like that the RGEM has no interest.
  13. Agree the Ukie leans flat, the cmc is flat, the euro is a HECS and euro ensembles lean flat. GFS is most likely wrong.
  14. Yea I’m not interested in this unless the RGEM comes on board especially because it’s solution makes sense for clippers.
  15. That’s ok. Would rather it be less amped til his far out.
  16. We haven’t had a clipper in a while. The question with clippers is will the moisture make it to the coast?
  17. Still hard to believe that CPK received only 0.9 after midnight while parts of the Bronx got 3+ from that second batch. I'm still skeptical of the numbers being that low at CPK but I guess it's possible.
  18. Sort of deceptive then but that is funny.
  19. Similar to CMC the secondary develops too late, not a terrible look but as others have stated Miller B's are usually tough for us. https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?rh=2023030412&fh=186&dpdt=&mc=&r=us_ne&p=prateptype_cat_ecmwf-imp&m=ecmwf_full
  20. Weak and flat is what you want to see at hour 168, not amped. However the Ukie is a terrible model lately.
  21. Way too far out still to say it's going anyway IMO. The ensembles look good and that's what matters more than OP runs at this point.
  22. I think that comes into play more so in April.
  23. Secondary on CMC but too weak/late unless you live in Boston. https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?m=gdps&p=prateptype-imp&rh=2023030412&fh=174&r=conus&dpdt=&mc= https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?m=gdps&p=prateptype-imp&rh=2023030412&fh=180&r=conus&dpdt=&mc=
  24. Baby steps on gfs at the surface the low went from Iowa/Minnesota border to Chicago. I still think at best we are looking at a miller B scenario.
×
×
  • Create New...