Jump to content

SnoSki14

Members
  • Posts

    15,930
  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

About SnoSki14

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location:
    East Brunswick, NJ

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I still can't believe the GFS OP pulled this off.
  2. Let's keep our expectations in check though. Remember NAM struggles mightily beyond 36-48hrs, we're just entering its more accurate range.
  3. Correct. Whatever hundredths of QPF we lose to a mix won't matter once the storm gets going.
  4. Well when you keep weening out over every storm eventually you'll be right.
  5. Good point. Imagine the panic tomorrow if warnings go up for 12-18"+
  6. Is the public really aware of this. I know they generally expect snow just from talking to people but I feel the hype has been far less than the Jan storm.
  7. If it follows that playback then amounts will keep going up until start time
  8. I saw that and was in awe. I don't recall seeing a 60-72 hour ensemble prog that strong. The true scope of what's unfolding may not even be apparent yet if that's correct.
  9. Because it's not done trending yet.
  10. It tends to be more suppressed in general. Odd outputs sometimes. I remember with the Jan storm it kept spewing 3-4" totals over NYC and into my region too vs the 10"+ amounts we got.
  11. Having a 3 day ensemble mean have a 976 low is crazy.
  12. If only it started tomorrow afternoon. Another harrowing day of model runs before the whole picture comes together
  13. I know we always worry about could go wrong but what if the storm is still trending towards a bullseye.
×
×
  • Create New...