Jump to content

SnoSki14

Members
  • Posts

    15,703
  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location:
    East Brunswick, NJ

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. 6z Nam looks a lot better than 0z...much more in line with other models
  2. Adjusted WSW to 7-13 now which I completely agree with. Front end thump will bring the goods followed by sleet/ZR. It's gonna be a mess 6z HRRR showing that crazy front end dump. Big improvement over 0z
  3. I'll give what it shows tomorrow a lot more weight than tonight but it's great at picking up warm layers so we can't discount it
  4. Yeah so much for suppression fears Trough out west was a big red flag for this.
  5. I can practically hear snowman19's giddiness after seeing the Nam.
  6. Epic bust if Nam is correct. Gives me in central NJ like 3" before going to sleet lol
  7. Yeah the pattern actually gets a lot better after our next storm. In fact the current pattern ain't that great, there's way too much troughiness out west (no wonder we're mixing) Kind of a miracle if we do get 8-10"+ amounts out of it
  8. Out of curiosity does anyone have sleet/ZR totals from the Nam. Curious to see the ice outputs
  9. The ridge placement out west for this storm wasn't ideal. MJO wasn't ideal either. There's a reason why big snowstorms are a rare commodity here especially in the CC era. Good news is pattern actually gets better after this storm. Better PNA and more favorable MJO
  10. It's good for verifying mixing but only in the short range. It's not reliable beyond 36hrs
  11. I hope Nam is wrong because this will be a nasty ice event here. Surface temps aren't budging away from the coast and will probably verify colder than models show.
×
×
  • Create New...