Jump to content

MJO812

No access to MA
  • Posts

    80,843
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by MJO812

  1. We don't want a positive PNA along with a negative epo , AO and NAO. Suppression would be a risk.
  2. Combine that with a negative NAO and negative EPO and we should be good. That's not really that negative to be alarmed.
  3. Agree This will change many more times but his post is a valid concern.
  4. He thinks we can't get snow with a negative PNA. Chances of that further south are not as good as further north but as long the NAO and EPO cooperate , that should be enough.
  5. Agree with you there Hopefully the models are wrong with that and they lessen the trough out west.
  6. Seeing Alaska like that is great You would need the PNA to be negative if the NAO is also negative and AO also. You don't want suppression.
  7. Really good sign A negative PNA isn't bad at all if we get a negative NAO. We need the ridge.
  8. Epo looks good on the 6z gefs around the timeframe of the storm for next week
  9. Epo looks good on the 6z gefs around the timeframe of the storm for next week
  10. NAO looks better this morning
  11. Our winter is down to 2 months ( sometimes get lucky in March)
  12. Euro stalls out in 7 and gfs moves along into 8. Something to consider.
  13. Our 1st threat around the 21st ? Gfs is now on board along with the Euro and CMC. Euro was the warmest out of the bunch. As always the interior will be favored but we will track it.
  14. CMC just got upgraded so let's see how it fares this winter.
  15. Nice cold pattern on the GFS Almost showed a Christmas miracle Cmc
×
×
  • Create New...