George001
-
Posts
6,140 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Forums
American Weather
Media Demo
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by George001
-
Not buying it. It will come back north. -
I don’t buy the OTS solutions at all. This is going to trend hundreds of miles north over the next couple of days. I’ve been saying it, look at how far west the western ridge axis is.
-
The 16-17th has 6-12 potential, a solid moderate event. However, this threat is a lot bigger.
-
Euro is way north this run, still out to sea but it’s very close.
-
Agree, it will come north.
-
You buy the gfs solution?
-
Interesting low location
-
Yeah, the Canadian actually has so much cold air that it snows EAST of the low hour 180. The low rams into SNE and it still gives my area blizzard conditions. I’ve never seen snow so close to the low like that before.
-
That’s going to be a nuke
-
Yeah you guys west are in a good spot for this
-
979mb just inside the benchmark
-
holy shit, on the gfs the storm evolves into a BLIZZARD for all of eastern mass! Inside 7 days, an actual fucking BLIZZARD!
-
The trough is deeper and energy is stronger on the gfs, I like seeing that
-
Jan Medium/Long Range Disco 2: Total Obliteration is Coming
George001 replied to Jebman's topic in Mid Atlantic
JB is a climate change denying clown -
Jan Medium/Long Range Disco 2: Total Obliteration is Coming
George001 replied to Jebman's topic in Mid Atlantic
This isn’t a moderate nino though, it’s super. Aren’t Nina’s more common after strong or super ninos? -
Yeah, it’s not a perfect setup but I would take that and run. Half a foot of snow and then an inch of sleet would be a great outcome especially since there is another threat following that is a better setup for the coast. That’s the nice thing about having a good airmass, even if the track isn’t ideal these runs are still giving me a good about of snow before any changeover.
-
Yeah, looks like more sleet than ice.
-
That said, the setup for the 20-21st threat is much better for coastal areas. The ridge axis is centered over Montana for that one and the blocking is starting to weaken a bit.
-
I would like it to come east, but this solution fits the 500mb pattern. I don’t think it’s a great pattern for the coast due to the location of the western ridge axis, it’s just too far west. For coastal areas an ideal location for the western ridge is centered over Montana, for this threat it’s centered over Washington. It’s also more of a Miller A rather than a Miller B.
-
It’s going to come back NW. I’m more worried about an inland runner than suppression in this pattern.
-
Not when the Navy’s on board
-
Yeah, low rams into CT.
-
The gfs looked close to something a lot bigger. If the energy digs just a little more for the 17th, the strength of the low will begin to increase on future runs.
-
Yeah I remember you brought up that this could be a colder version of 2015-2016 a few months ago. Hopefully we get a big storm this year way north of the blizzard that year.
-
To be fair to Snowman, he called for Dec and Jan to be warm and Feb to be more favorable. That seems like a reasonable call right now, similar to 2015-2016 (which is looking like a very good analog). Feb 2016 I remember being a pretty good month, even though the winter was overall mild and BN snow for my area.
