George001

Yeah the latest guidance has a weaker than average polar vortex into mid Jan.

Euro is a nuke

18z gfs looks great for you

Where do you want the low to be?

Why can’t you be happy for the north?

Be patient, things will be different this year. That was in the past.

I stand corrected, but I am glad to see it looks like they will keep doing well. I am going to be skiing a lot in December, so I have a good reason to be excited for the north. Plenty of time for my area to get snow later in the month.

I hope the GFS has the right idea. Great run for the north, would be a great start for ski resorts.

Way north. Low plows into SE mass.

Oh well he’s probably right then. The ceiling isn’t that high here anyways, so I’ll root for the north even if it means I get nothing. I gotta root against Tblizz here, nothing against the guy but he’s been super negative and made comparisons to previous winters. Don’t get me wrong, being negative in this setup is completely logical. The high is leaving, which is a huge limitation. I just don’t agree with comparing to previous winters.

You are 15 miles southeast of me, in my opinion that’s going to matter for this storm. I could be wrong, but im betting on me getting a minor snow event and you getting all rain.

I am in a much better spot than you are for this storm. I don’t think I am getting a lot, but nothing is unlikely.

It’s going to be a good event for ski areas. You will get nothing because you live in the ocean and it’s not winter yet.

Great run for ski areas. Honestly, I’d be happy with it verbatim even though it’s more of a messy solution for my area.

Agree with most of this, but think the second half of December could be interesting. The 2-3rd threat is real, but id favor NW of both of us for plowable snows at this stage. If we can thread the needle and squeeze out 4-8 inches that would be awesome, but those mild early Dec ocean temps are going to be working against us. Still worth keeping an eye on though.