Jump to content

mattie g

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    14,062

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by mattie g

  1. mattie g
    @MN Transplant: How much for Gap, PA?
  2. mattie g
    Same. Taking the VRE from the city to Burke can be night and day in marginal setups, whether during or just after. Being at 325’ or so and a few miles west of the fall line can make a really noticeable difference. Ticked up a degree in Burke - now at 28 - but it doesn’t really matter. No concerns at all with the WAA piece. It only once the transfer begins that I’ll have to worry about snizzle. Of course, after that I’ll have to worry about whether I’ll get in the southern tip of the CCB.
  3. mattie g
    Oh yeah?
  4. mattie g
    Looks awesome! Wish I were closer and could have made it over!
  5. mattie g
    I kind of liked that NAM run, even before the smarter people chimed in. The WAA part is uncomplicated, and even if the NAM is a little juiced it certainly won’t be out to lunch.
  6. mattie g
    Two more trends like this and we’re risking 12” while 40 miles away is pure destruction.
  7. mattie g
    Storm escapes to the NE on the NAM - no real deform to speak of - it the WAA was pretty money. Not particularly concerned about it at that range.
  8. mattie g
    We’ve discussed it extensively (ad nauseam, really) in the past few days, too.
  9. mattie g
    Would require elongation, but I think the moisture will allow for it.
  10. mattie g
    I’m 60% OK with it. Need that low to stall for longer and/or a tick south. Not a lot - I’ll take just the tip...of the deform.
  11. mattie g
    You can see the low forming off OC MD here.
  12. mattie g
    Let’s pull a January 2010 in opposite!
  13. mattie g
    I think we’re still well within the southern range of solutions. We’ll see what the Euro has to say, but we only need a out a 50-mile more souther capture and we’re in the goods. Staying interested, even if not expectant.
  14. mattie g
    More serious (but not like super serious or anything) question: Is it true that the RGEM beyond like 60 hours the same model output as the CMC at that timeframe, just at higher resolution?
  15. mattie g
    @Mrs.J ... Edit before this post gets nuked : Not getting my hopes up based on just the RGEM, but this movement a bit south so far in the 12z suite is encouraging. Hell...even if it means we extend the enjoyment of tracking higher-end potential for another 6 hours, then it’s worth it.
  16. mattie g
    This was some incredibly dry, but ridiculously funny, humor from @Solution Man
  17. mattie g
    I guess I’ll take 30”. Right? RIGHT?!?!
  18. mattie g
    Wife and I decided to use this storm as a math lesson (graphing) for our currently homeschooled 2nd grader. She and I will measure the snow at regular intervals, then plot them on a graph. After that, I’ll show her how to do it in Excel, which she’s excited about! p But I guess if we don’t get all terribly much snow, we’ll just plot at a 1/4” scale.
  19. mattie g
    True...I’m also embarrassed for myself. Good to see you back, Chill!
  20. mattie g
    But really I’m just embarrassed that I’ve been telling friends and family to expect 7-14” over two days.
  21. mattie g
    No less than 66.67% of what those who get smoked get. So if the general max (not including lollies) is 20”, then like 12-13”. I have an issue with “losing.”
  22. mattie g
    I’ll say it again...but I won’t pretend to be unmoved by this thing increasingly looking to leave me with relative scraps. I won’t personally be thrilled to see 4” or just appreciate what falls. I won’t whine and cry about it, but by the same token I can be kinda pissed off about how it’s all turned out. I’ll go about my day tomorrow, enjoy the snow with the kids, and try to look at the radar while folks north of us get smoked. Then I’ll move on to tracking the next fail with the rest of you idiots.
  23. mattie g
    I woke up this morning, had a look at some runs from last night and this morning and said “f*ck,” then came downstairs to make breakfast.
  24. mattie g
    What an incredible year...especially the couple weeks from when we reeled that late-January storm north through February 10. Crazy shite.
  25. mattie g
    I mean...I'm purpled, but 7" or so would be kind of lame for 36 hours of snow.
×
×
  • Create New...