Jump to content

ORH_wxman

Moderator Meteorologist
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    90,892

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by ORH_wxman

  1. ORH_wxman
    You don't want that bumped more....best banding is typically just N of H7 fronto
  2. ORH_wxman
    I've become more and more disillusioned with clown maps...they are lazy and often too wrong...looking at mid-levels and soundings is way better.
  3. ORH_wxman
    This is poundtown look at H7
  4. ORH_wxman
    Def a good bump N of 06z through 24h.
  5. ORH_wxman
    12z NAM so far seems to have more northern stream interaction through 18h vs 06z....so we'll see if this bumps back a touch NW with the precip shield.
  6. ORH_wxman
    Alright man....see you in April then.
  7. ORH_wxman
    Eastern coastline....it's fine back west.
  8. ORH_wxman
    Clipper for Thu night has been coming back stronger the last 24h.
  9. ORH_wxman
    Tossed. Southern outlier now.
  10. ORH_wxman
    Can’t rule it out. You prob want to see a little tick back north to feel safe there.
  11. ORH_wxman
    Midlevels look very good for that corridor. But prior to going to bed last night I had mentioned a steep cutoff in precip and that’s still showing up this morning so im thinking it’s real. I think less northern stream interaction is helping increase the gradient. Someone is going to get absolutely smoked though on the northern side where the fronto band sets up.
  12. ORH_wxman
    There definitely seems to be not only a southward trend, but the precip cutoff is becoming tighter. You might go from a foot to 2” in a span of 15 miles if these solutions are correct. Something we’ll have to watch for on the next couple cycles…if that very tight gradient persists.
  13. ORH_wxman
    You are correct with this for most of the SNE forum members and a chunk of the southern CNE members. Coast still has some legit concerns though…esp like cape over to SE CT coast.
  14. ORH_wxman
    Clown maps are prob going to be woefully overdone on the southern 20% of their coverage.
  15. ORH_wxman
    No they dont
  16. ORH_wxman
    That was actually a really nice run for your ‘hood looking at H7.
  17. ORH_wxman
    When I was toggling h5 at 42h, it was def a tick north. I don’t toggle QPF maps when I’m doing my analysis
  18. ORH_wxman
    Euro looks a touch more amped at 42h?
  19. ORH_wxman
    Yeah there’s still another full day of model guidance to tickle back north. Even right now, the midlevels aren’t bad for S NH…maybe not jackpot but pretty good
  20. ORH_wxman
    They used to a long time ago before that. I am pretty sure that old criteria was sub-20F.
  21. ORH_wxman
    Agreed. It’s plausible but it requires some pretty awesome dynamics like we saw on the 12z Euro run yesterday and some of those GFS runs. Im sticking with 8-12 here and if some of these runs inside of 36h starting tonight decide to go bonkers, then you can always adjust. The one thing I hate telling people historically as a forecaster is to expect high amounts and then have to cut back really late in the game.
  22. ORH_wxman
    Yeah there’s some high stakes out east as it tries to go bonkers at the end but it’s doing it slightly too late.
  23. ORH_wxman
    Euro looks a bit more compressed through 36h compared to 06z.
  24. ORH_wxman
    There’s still a good amount of difference in 925 temps between model guidance. GFS is a bit more marginal with like -2 or -3 at 925 but euro goes like -5 to -6 in the CCB. That’s going to be a difference of at least 4” during the meat of it imho. Also rates will decide a large portion of the CP’s fate.
  25. ORH_wxman
    Yeah I hear you. This pattern has been chaos on guidance. Lot of shortwaves in the flow. It could easily end up as nothing. GFS has two moderate threats before that…sometimes we miss those when searching for the unicorns.
×
×
  • Create New...