ORH_wxman

I think the fact that 2016 was so far below previous years in spring got people convinced. At one point it was over 1,000,000 sq km lower than 2012. But this is another very good season as proof the late spring/early summer is what matters most. So much of the ice in March and April that contributes to that higher extent is completely irrelevant to the arctic basin where the ice remains in late summer/early fall. That said, this year is still going to be pretty damned low I think. It's still got top 3 potential. But it won't be anywhere near 2012. But we can't rule out something close to 2007 or 2011 if August has a hostile weather pattern.

The other thread we have temporarily hidden as we try and figure out the root cause of the slowdowns on the new software. The huge mega threads seem to cause some issues. Hopefully we figure it out soon. In the meantime, Both extent and area are currently 4th lowest. Though area is threatening to fall to the 6th over the next few days if the losses remain mundane.

Sucks that CT SIA is still down...we may not have it in time to narrow the prediction in June like the past few years. We'll still probably be able to make a somewhat skillful prediction, but probably not as precisely if we don't have good CT SIA data. Extent data in June is not very helpful.

It's still pretty early, but I'd probably put my odds closer to skier's numbers...even a bit lower. Maybe 1 in 3. We're tied with 2011 for volume, but due to lower extent/area at this time of the year than 2011, the average thickness is higher. More like 2010's avg thickness. We'll need an especially bad summer pattern to pass 2012. I'd probably normally put my odds much lower...like around 1 in 5...but the early pattern that blew the ice away from the southern Beaufort should be a good start to the melt season there...which is a critical region early on. So a big head start there helps in narrowing the gap to overcome. But still...if we're starting from something like 2011...even that year finished over 1 million sq km higher than 2012. So there's a big gap to overcome. The combo of weather and ice dynamics will have to do it.

Nice archive there. Glad the model runs reflected my memory well, lol. You can see how far north the ETA was compared to the AVN on Saturday night.

It was actually much better in the Mid-Atlantic as the core of the cold air came in from the Lakes/OH Valley...for New England, it is better to have the core come in from Quebec/eastern Ontario. It was still brutal cold though up here....but to see DCA have a high of 7F in the afternoon is crazy. Only the midnight high stopped the actual high temp from being single digits.

I just checked 1/17/82 for DCA and that 10F high was a cheap midnight high too. Their afternoon high was 7F. That is absolutely ridiculous for DCA. The low of -5F occurred with NW winds of 20mph gusting to 30mph.

I've had some conversations with zwyts in the past about how underrated January 1982 was for a winter month. Probably gets overshadowed by Feb '83 blizzard and PDI a few years earlier...kind of sandwiched between two great storms. That was a frigid month though with good snow. Probably one of the better snow cover months for DCA considering they didn't get a massive storm. The cold shot before the Air Florida storm was really impressive. Managed to choke the Potomac with ice after only 3 days. I want to say DCA put up a below zero low in there somewhere too during that stretch. I think Matt had told me they ran the table on snow cover too from the Air Florida storm to the end of the month...aided by another couple advisory events. Close to 3 weeks of continuous snow cover.

Oh I know the signal was good a good couple weeks out on a much better pattern for storminess and cold (I was one of the few also trying to keep all the cliff jumpers from diving)...I was just talking once we got inside of 5 days, there was nothing that would really make you predict a historic blizzard until we got inside of 72...the whole setup was really too far east on guidance and we got that ideal, monster phase that showed up on Friday night to bring things back for eastern areas (Euro subsequently came even further west, but ended up wrong).

There was really nothing obvious at 3-4 days lead time. The trough looked too far east. It required pretty deep phasing to pull that storm back for us.

Those are interesting totals...when I made my map years ago, there was a thin stripe of <=18" totals down the Housatonic Valley. I think Lanesboro had 18" and Great Barrington had 13". I never did find a Pittsfield number as they stopped reporting snow in 1970 at their site. I would suspect Pittsfield did ok since they are above 1,000 feet, but 30 inches would surprise me a bit. The Stockbridge coop discontinued in 1985 and Adams in 1978, so unfortunately nothing official there. The Kocin Book has what looks to be 13" in AQW, but can't say for sure that is where the number comes from since it isn't labeled on those maps. He does have a couple 48" amounts on what looks like the spine of the Berkshires...I never found those totals (best I found was 44.5"), but they are probably pretty accurate given what we know about that storm.

This is awesome, thanks for sharing. That is some excellent video of the changing conditions. Even just being in downtown ORH, the video captures the wind well, the wind was relentless even inland...of course, its on another level on the coast.

We lost power for 3 days in this ice storm in Dec 2008...it really sucked. But I'll admit, I might do it again because it was pretty cool seeing that much ice. Maybe like a once a decade type thing.

Wow. Yeah you're right. They must have went insane that early morning. They ended up with the same that ORH got and interior elevated SE MA.

Did Weymouth get that much? I thought 2 feet was more like Randolph to stoughton to Walpole/Foxborough and further east was more like 16-20.

Hence why I had to dig out the term "firehose" from the arsenal. That was like a 700 mile fetch from off the Atlantic out of the east.

I couldn't believe how low so many forecasts were even away from the immediate coast. BOS itself was definitely a tougher call...but those forecasts for the 128 belt down into interior SE MA were amazingly bearish.

I would be concerned about Codfishsnowman's well-being. I actually have a small error on my map I need to correct...I didn't extend the decent snow into elevated SE MA...Walpole had over a foot but it looks like they got about 5" on my map. My Woonsocket total is wrong too...not 20"...it should be 22.5". I actually like the Natick coop....4.5" of QPF and 18." of snow, lol. That is gross.

It was a syzygy...lunar eclipse the night before on Dec 9, 1992. One of the reasons the tide was so destructive.

Yeah any buckets in that storm would have been almost useless...the coops that melted a core sample (while also remembering to measure any rain before the changeover) are the ones that got accurate QPF totals.

You'll love the Woonsocket report...7.11" of QPF and 22.5" of snow, lol.

Both coops just south of ORH in Charlton and Southbridge had between 3-4" of qpf...even Ashburnham to the north had 2.43" and they were definitely on the northern preiphery of the firehose.

The ORH total was probably compromised by the fact it got all clogged with snow...they didn't melt down qpf there like at coop stations.

Torrington had 3.34" of QPF and 20" of snow.

1.38" at BDL.