Jump to content

ORH_wxman

Moderator Meteorologist
  • Posts

    90,902
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ORH_wxman

  1. 30” is tough for any given one spot. For ORH, there’s 3 such storms on record. If you want to count 1888, that makes 4 (they had 32” in that storm but the official records didn’t begin until 1892 there). BOS has zero 30” storms on record. Though they have come close on a number of them. Parts of SE MA have had several (1978, 2005, 2015). Then you have NE MA where some spots have had a few...Feb ‘69, Dec ‘03 (in a narrow swath), Jan 2015 a little further west toward northern 495 belt. But you’d be hard pressed to find a single point that has more than 3 I’d imagine. Now, there’s definitely no shortage of 20”+ storms in eastern areas. Most places have double digit storms in the 20”+ range.
  2. That’s not bad. Good anomalies in the Davis Strait there. If we’re nitpicking, I’d want it slightly more north, but I was more talking about if the blocking was most pronounced in the North Atlantic and closer toward New foundland. Thats also a D16 smoothed ensemble mean so you don’t actually see a “block” there. It just kind of hints at where it might be.
  3. Too early to rule out a big winter impact from 1/1 threat, but it’s trending the wrong direction right now. Monster western trough carves out and bides its time while the confluence lifts out. Then it decides to lift northeast perfectly timed for a big cutter. Its possible all that timing will not work out as we get closer and perhaps it ends up more wintry but I’m not overly optimistic at the moment.
  4. I’d roll the dice again on Feb 2010. I agree we don’t need something that extreme, but it often works out for us. The one worry I potentially would have is the block won’t set up far enough north. If it sets up a bit south and southwest of Greenland it can actually be a detriment. We want it up into Greenland and Davis Strait. The pacific is progged to be kind of meh in early January so a good NAO block is not a bad thing.
  5. All the blocks I listed were uber/crazy blocks. Point is that people should not expect the same outcomes. The 2010 PTSD in here is fascinating.
  6. I wonder what y’all would’ve said in Feb ‘69....or Dec 2010/first half of Jan 2011. Or March 2001.
  7. Seems like the blocking isn’t really robust until after New Years. It’s around but not going gangbusters until that 1/1 system passes. Btw that trough that is responsible for the 1/1 system looks ridiculous. Where’s the Hadley cell when you need it? Lol, that thing is digging into Cabo SanLucas Even the ensemble mean is pretty aggressive.
  8. Yeah there’s never guarantees that far out. But it’s as good as you can really get in the 11-15.
  9. I don’t have the index numbers but the hemispheric H5 pattern is about as staunchly pro-blocking in the NAO/AO region as I have seen it at this lead time since the 2010-2011 winter. Hard to get an ensemble mean this bullish out at 12-15 days.
  10. Yeah this is one of the worst ones I’ve seen. 1996 was pretty bad though. We had like 8-10” of high content pack leftover from the Dec 6-8 storms wiped out on xmas eve. That one didn’t quite have the winds of this one but I do recall pretty strong winds regardless.
  11. GFS would be ok there for 12/29. Foreign guidance is uglier though. We usually know how that movie ends.....lol. The pattern does have some upslope potential at times so I’m sure it will still give snow events for your ‘hood even if the synoptic ones are garbage. It would be nice to get a few synoptic storms to work out though. NNE could use the snow for base building on snow mobile trails and ski resorts.
  12. Yeah 3 in a row. 2017 was ridiculous. Like -10 temps lol with a couple small refreshers. Some crappy luck on the evolution of the Xmas storm up north. Ukie was actually the first to show it a few days ago and all other guidance slowly came on board which eliminated 12/29 threat. Now the 1/1 threat looks uglier too but still time to fix that one.
  13. I don’t think I’ll ever see as bad a 4 year stretch as 1988-1989 through 1991-1992 winters. Just brutal. At least I hope I don’t see it, lol.
  14. The blocking gets pretty extreme one some of the guidance later next week and into early January....that probably has at least some staying power. (fwiw....and I know it's not much....but the weeklies keep the -NAO blocking right through late January...finally breaking it down at the end of the month) We'll see though....sure beats having a death vortex over Greenland/Davis Strait
  15. EPS look good out in the extended....there's a lot of NAO/AO blocking. We're going to have chances with that type of blocking....even with a pretty meh Pacific. EPO region actually does briefly attain some pretty big ridging around D7-10, so don't be surprised if the progs for near New Years and beyond show up colder as Canada may trend colder than currently shown if that EPO ridge materializes. I definitely would be optimistic in the longer range despite some turds in the immediate punch bowl over the next week or so.
  16. Yeah pack it in for a few days....then recheck to see if 1/1 looks good. There's a small chance 12/29 could still be pretty wintry, but it would require some changes to what we see right now.
  17. Yeah it's really a shitty setup with the Xmas storm retrograding into Hudson/Baffin region. I think we're going to need the 12/29 system to re-orient the blocking to more favorable with a bad Pacific not helping. 1/1 will have a chance if that happens.
  18. Ukie is actually just a straight cutter for 12/29....albeit kind of a weak one.
  19. Need more confluence to north....Xmas storm becomes too wrapped up and retrogrades which doesn't help. Grinch storm gives us two Christmas presents..... Euro/Ukie did look a little more favorable so we'll see if they try and produce at 12z.
  20. 12/29 looks pretty crappy....but can't rule out interior snows. A lot will depend on how the deepening Xmas storm behaves to our northeast as that is the source of any confluence....if it lifts N easily or retrogrades too far W, then it's probably no dice for snows in SNE and maybe even CNE/eastern NNE.
  21. Yeah already offshore E MA by 12z Xmas morning. Just when we thought the new GFS might be reliable.....
  22. Yeah it’s slowing down every run too so it’s going to be tropical most of the day on Xmas instead of the front coming through early morning or overnight. Prob technically a white Xmas in many places at 7am but mudslides by lunchtime/afternoon.
×
×
  • Create New...