Jump to content

ORH_wxman

Moderator Meteorologist
  • Posts

    90,892
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ORH_wxman

  1. There will likely be more than one shot in this pattern. Obv big signal is there near 10th and just beyond but it looks pretty ripe for additional potential through the equinox anyway.
  2. Both were trying to hit your area down to metrowest harder with CCB tomorrow. I’m Still not biting on that but it’s gotten more interesting today.
  3. Very similar tracks actually. Primary went into about CLE/ERI in that one and the secondary popped just quick enough to turn a 6-10” event into a 12-18” event. Yeah…too bad we didn’t have a real airmass like that one did.
  4. Let’s close those MLs off about 30-40 miles southwest and watch BOS go 12/9/05-light for a few hours.
  5. Cutter is def possible. Just less likely than background state when you have a west based block. My recommendation (which will go unheeded, who am I kidding? lol) is to not really look at any OP runs beyond D6-7 during all of this. Stick to the ensembles and watch the clusters.
  6. Yep. And this thump is at night time so I’m not worried about insolation eating away at accumulations. That really wouldn’t matter anyway in heavy rates…but it might in something just a little more marginal like 3/4 to 1/2 mile vis type snow. If the thump ends up being most 1 mile vis light snow, then it wasn’t worth getting stressed out about anyway. You cost yourself like an inch of snow. The faux sfc layer isn’t going to be the difference between 6” and 2” tonight.
  7. Wetbulb temp is like 31F at ORH and that’s with asos running a bit warm. I typically look at it this way….if there is going to be precip/snow worth really getting excited about, it’s going to wipe out that faux near-ground warm layer pretty quickly. If it can’t wipe it out, you weren’t missing much to begin with. Maybe you get 1-2” of glop instead of 3” of baking soda over 5 hours. But we were going to rip 6” in 5 hours, it’s mostly gonna happen even with the warmer sfc to start. You maybe lose a fraction on the front end, but otherwise dumping 0.15-0.20 per hour in the bucket is gonna wipe out the BL very quickly.
  8. Child’s play. We had one a few days ago that had like 70 inches over NE Ma. Lol
  9. Even where I am, I’m not expecting warning criteria. But something to watch this afternoon on the trends for late this evening…latest rap is showing the increasing snows in CT/RI as well.
  10. Latest hrrr pounds N CT with warning criteria. Been trending toward bigger rates in that 03z-07z timeframe.
  11. Dewpoints are really what we want to look at. It’s the wetbulb temps that matter not the sfc temps at noontime in March sunshine in an unsaturated column.
  12. Normally I’d like seeing things collapsing SE near the islands but the problem is the midlevel centers get initially too far north so we can’t really crush +SN for 6 hours like we normally might. We’re getting hammered by an easterly 850 flow while we’re dryslotted aloft…maybe midlevels collapse faster as we get closer….but we’d need it to really take advantage. Still thinking 3-4” of crud here mostly from the thump.
  13. The pattern is reminiscent of some Marches that produced huge storms (1958, 1960, 2001, etc). But it doesn’t mean we’ll cash in the same way obviously. We’ve had exceptional March blocking produce nothing too.
  14. Trend so far at 12z seems like to try and push the secondary E or even ESE a little quicker once it reaches a position near E LI to islands.
  15. Classic SWFE with the DGZ way up high. If only we actually had some nice low level arctic air then the baking powder would accumulate way easier. This year has been putrid for lowest levels. Even in events where 925 is like -5 or -6, I’ve had several times where it translates to 33F here when probably at least half the time or even more we’d be inverted and even colder at the sfc…not this season though.
×
×
  • Create New...