ORH_wxman

The thing about individual sites in New England is that it’s very easy to compare data…we have a fairly dense network of climate sites and mesonets. PVD is absolutely running too cold too. There is plenty of empirical evidence for both PVD and ORH biases. If one wants to ignore that empirical evidence, then that is fine…just don’t ask others to agree with you unless you provide some strong empirical evidence to counter those claims.

The empirical evidence for ORH running too warm is overwhelming. I’m not sure how you can look at data for more than a few minutes and conclude otherwise. Even if you do not trust MADIS, just compare sthe ORH monthly departures to other first order climate stations in SNE and you’ll see consistently that ORH runs warmer. They are also consistently warmer than just about every single mesonet site at similar elevation near them. I’ve looked at this extensively since discovering the issue. Here’s the MADIS graph on a longer timeline. Pretty obvious step change in 2020 that also aligns with ORH’s divergence from other first order sites on monthly departure

There’s at least some clustering down off the Delmarva on the individual ensemble plot…but still pretty buckshot overall which is not unexpected D6-7

Agreed we’re not far off on threat probability but I’d prob trade spots with you on this particular setup all else equal. Latitude really helps on that look as it appears on guidance right now. Might be enough to outweigh ocean influence…esp since the high looks decent so you won’t really have to worry about a big east flow off the water…but I’m starting to digress into details that could easily change.

Yeah last winter was comical on the high placements. Hopefully we get some positive regression this year on that front. Why not start with this system.

Yeah ideally there’s enough spacing for both waves but that might be tough. EPS does have several of the Dec 4th solutions cold enough for a chunk of SNE but a couple of the even snowier looks for most of SNE seem to be on the Dec 5-6 wave. Im not overly optimistic yet where I am in the interior…anything shovelable would be gravy this early. But there’s enough of a chance to monitor.

There’s some good members in there…esp for northern half of SNE. But a few get everyone. At least there’s a reason to look at guidance inside of D7 right now.

Euro is a close miss for a follow up wave on Dec 6-7. So that’s one we may have to watch as well. Still think 12/3-4 is a heavy lift for SNE big snow, but not so much for NNE.

Nice hit for CNE/NNE on euro for 12/3-4 system. A pinch colder and we can get SNE into the game. There’s likely going to be another chance though behind that system. Lot of shortwaves in the flow.

I think you’re started there. Unless an unforeseen long duration cutter or something happens, the pattern going forward doesn’t look close to warm enough to get rid of that.

Park at Alwife and take red line down to Park St and then it’s about a 5 min walk.

The flow has like 3 shortwaves embedded in there and it’s probably going to be a clusterfook on model guidance to figure them out until we’re closer. That leading subtle cold press late this week into NNE will be pretty important too for setting up the baroclinic zone.

Tuesday 12/19 should work for me too but I’ll confirm.

Interesting developments overnight. Like Tip and I were discussing yesterday, seeing more of a cold push just ahead of the action. Not sure it will be enough for us, but we’re in the game on a lot of guidance. Still looks like primarily an NNE threat to me synoptically but one more push colder and that certainly changes.

Yeah hopefully we can get a solid event or two in during the final 2 weeks of the month for the holidays and then carry that into a great January pattern. Anything before that is gravy…and I do think the pattern prior to mid-month can support an event, it’s just a little harder given the imperfections plus climo still being a little skimpy in early December.

Yeah he almost moved to the snow pits of Lancaster or Whitefield when he was looking at properties. I always joke that when he was asking me about those properties, I was like the group of kids in The Sandlot that go “nooooooo!!!!” and start running after him when Smalls is about to climb the over wall to get the baseball unaware of what is lurking behind it. Then when he asked about that Randolph property at 1500 feet I said “that’s about as good as it gets in that area”

Yes that’s what I immediately remembered when I saw Hermit Lake. Phin had a couple diatribes about how misleading it was to call it “Gorham” in the PNS. They prob should at least put an elevation note on it…I’ve seen PNS reports do that before.

Weeklies looked decent after mid-month still. They go full-on weenie after Xmas and into January. 5 day mean leading into Xmas 5 day mean in early January.

Still a lot of guidance disagreement for 2nd week of December....GEPS on the colder end, EPS on the warmer end, GEFS in between but prob closer to GEPS. This is likely due to the differences in the tropical Pacific where the EPS on the last few runs has had stronger forcing into phase 4/5 than the other model suites.

Oh yeah, I've seen that before....I think that's exactly what it is.

Yeah having been up in that area many times, there's almost no way they got that much with Wildcat/Pinkham getting 2".

Canadian comes close....nice for NNE, but we're not far off from something better here. Certainly colder than the 00z run....but we're obviously still about a week out so there's a ton of time for changes.

12/2 was the most popular pick so that date should prob stick...I'm going to be in Maine this weekend, so I won't be there unfortunately, but I will definitely try and make a local Clarke's pre-Xmas GTG if a few of us are interested in that. I am in Boston a few days a week now, so it wouldn't be very hard for me to come on over after work.

I think GaWX was using a true 2.0....not rounded. Since 1965-66 with its rounded 2.0 trimonthly peak is usually classified as "strong" and not "super" because it had an unrounded trimonthly avg below 2.0 (something like 1.97 IIRC).

There's another weaker signal for Dec 7-8 too....I think the Dec 4-6 one is prob too warm for us though...NNE might be different. Some of it will depend on how the NAO block shakes out....that could still correct the whole system south since the block will influence any potential 50/50 low and confluence in SE Canada.