Jump to content

ORH_wxman

Moderator Meteorologist
  • Posts

    89,554
  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

About ORH_wxman

  • Birthday 07/14/1981

Profile Information

  • Four Letter Airport Code For Weather Obs (Such as KDCA)
    KORH
  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location:
    KORH

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Dec '73 had almost 10 inches of QPF at ORH with 0.9 inches of snow....that's about as bad as it gets. It wasn't that cold, but it wasn't a full-on torch either. Just a bit AN....that would usually produce plenty of snow in that.
  2. Yeah or even if that southern stream would weaken a bit....the NMB guidance actually weakened it enough so that more of the baroclinicty was focused near the main shortwave so it tries to blow up a coastal....still not fully clean, but it would be shovelable snow for most of SNE and prob warning snow for your area. http://www.meteo.psu.edu/ewall/ETAEAST_12z/etaloop.html
  3. Yeah its honestly probably costing us double digit snowfall...not an exaggeration. That shortwave is potent....that would be a classic.
  4. I wasn’t. SE NH is unlikely to be a good spot for the upcoming system or any IVT. Best shot at an inch or two is SE MA and then maybe some IVT stuff in CT if you get lucky. I wouldn’t actually count on it though.
  5. SE NH is def the pork zone so far relative to climo. Areas like ASH to Derry over to DAW have been screwed pretty bad. They average double digits in December and while there’s still a couple weeks to go, they’ll keep falling behind unless a miracle happens on Friday or that Xmas system delivers.
  6. Dec 1968 was pretty brutal. Check out Boston’s F6 data for that month. Very cold month with over 6” of QPF and 5 inches of snow.
  7. We kind of have a perpetual high nosing down in the low levels despite parakeets at 500mb.
  8. Yeah…I’ll add that I do think seeing 06z slightly regress is a bad sign. A lot of times if you get a hard trend inside 3 days, it will just continue for like 4-6 consecutive cycles.
  9. 00z def improved from 18z but 06z did not improve from 00z and May have slightly regressed. Prob puts a cap on this things. We’ll see if 12z makes another bump back NW now that we are sampling most of the shortwave. If it doesn’t, that’s prob all she wrote.
  10. Yeah this is really darned close for E MA to a major storm. Need another tick for it to happen but at least it doesn’t require a miracle now. That shortwave is starting to look like something signficiant…that cyclonic curvature like Tip mentioned is notable.
  11. Yeah it’s meaningless if it’s only the NAM making this trend at 00z. I think that’s a given any time we view the NAM. Might give it a little more weight if the event was inside 36h.
  12. I’d like to get things about 5-7 days closer, but there’s some signs we could get a nice looking El Niño-Esque pattern in early January. Big western ridge pumped up by a retrograding Aleutian low. It would be a nice break to load the dice in our favor going into the coldest climo of the year. I want to get the pattern closer though before getting gung ho on the idea.
  13. I was actually thinking yesterday about how if this was going to make a move, it would prob be the 72-84h mark because that’s when the shortwave is coming onshore. Should be mostly Onshore 12z tomorrow but we’re already getting the front end of it tonight. If we get a reversion back SE tonight, then that’s a very good indicator given the better sampling…and just the fact we’re closer and the solution got worse. Both of us know from statistics and just years of experience how trends that happen closer to the event are more likely to be real.
×
×
  • Create New...