Back in the days, pre-internet, no ham shack was complete without a Heathkit station! Holy grail was the ID-4001 system and (of course) the ID-5001 system that came later. Capable of good numbers and true realtime readings. Rainwise was another option. None were particularly cost conscious of course.
Unless you have a grant or specific reason to spend upwards of $50k for a truly professional station that is designed to last for decades, there are plenty of choices for the consumer/prosumer out there.
I recently connected a WeatherFlow Tempest unit and still am evaluating it. For the money (approx. $300 USD) and no recurring fees, it seems like a solid unit. Many will be happy with its compact form factor (HOA/WAF friendly!) too. It's not without quirks, of course, but from what I'm seeing so far it seems like a safe bet if spending over $700-$1000 for a fully featured station like the Davis 6163 is out of your budget.
Wind accuracy not only depends on anemometer design itself but location. Most home sites aren't very friendly for accurate wind measurements using standard rule of 10 meters AGL for anemometer and three times height for ANY obstruction. With ultrasonic anemometers we like to see 1km from any tree line or tall buildings, etc. A lot of the home stations also have a slower reporting rate without memory/buffer meaning that the wind reading captured happens to be whatever is happening at that time of reporting. Optimally, the system is reading continually in between reports and shows min/avg/gust/max values. Ultrasonic instruments can sample much faster, some programmed as high as 100Hz! So if the post time (in the example of a remote site that's autonomous) is every 60 seconds, there will be 6000 data points! 10-30Hz is more typical with these setups and where precision is needed heaters and other mitigations are required to maintain repeatability for ultrasonic anemometers as well as sonic thermography.